Ain Shams University vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport - AASTMT vs Zewail City of Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Supportive academic and personal growth environment
- +Vibrant campus life and student activities
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
- +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
- +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
- +Practical skill development and future career preparation
- +Supportive and engaging campus atmosphere with diverse fields of study
- +Internationally recognized and respected degrees
- +Expert professors and high-quality education
- +Hands-on learning and practical experience
- +Supportive staff and well-equipped campus
- +High-quality, knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse academic programs and learning opportunities
- +Positive student activities and general atmosphere
- +Broad range of extracurricular and personal development subjects
- +Emphasis on student well-being and a positive university experience
- -Outdated curriculum and inadequate facilities are frustrating.
- -Lack of specialization options early in studies limits student choice.
- -Negative interactions with professors create a poor learning environment.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
- -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
- -Limited student life and campus facilities.
- -Lack of parking and dining options.
- -Insufficient university expansion for student needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution is a recurring problem.
This university demonstrates a strong academic focus, with its **professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.14 and **value** also scoring highly at 4.09. The **location** is also well-regarded. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** are the weaker areas, with ratings of 3.43 and 3.4 respectively, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.
Review of the university indicates a strong performance in academics, with the highest ratings for **Value** (4.17) and **Professors** (4.13). **Internationality** also scores well at 3.91. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest rating (3.48), suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, and Accomodation fall within a moderate to good range.
Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.4. Facilities also scored well at 4. Facilities and professors are notable strengths, while student life and location represent areas with the lowest ratings, at 3 and 3.2 respectively.
This institution performs exceptionally well in **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. Other areas like **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received positive marks, all averaging 3.75. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, which scored 3.67 and 3.5 respectively, representing the lower end of the evaluated categories.
This institution excels in key areas, earning top marks for its facilities, professors, location, and student life, all rated a perfect 5. Value for money also scores highly at 5. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness with a rating of 2, and internationality is a moderate area at 3.
Most reviews (~81%) highlight supportive professors and a great academic/campus environment. A small portion (~7%) mentioned outdated curricula or administrative issues.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.
With a 4.09 average rating from 23 reviews, approximately 83% highlight growth and skill development through challenging coursework and formative experiences. A small amount of feedback (~4%) mentions poor student life and lack of campus activities.
Students highly rate academics, professors, and facilities, with ~100% positive feedback. Some noted a need for better course organization and more student life engagement.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students highlight diverse learning opportunities and quality faculty. Limited attention to non-academic activities was noted in one review.
With one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. This feedback was entirely positive, highlighting an appreciation for diverse, non-major subject offerings.
Ain Shams University is one of the best universities in Egypt. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the academic environment encourages learning and personal growth. The campus offers a great atmosphere, and there are many student activities that make university life enjoyable. I'm proud to be part of this university and would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a high-quality education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My university, Zewail City of Science and Technology, is a fantastic option for a high-quality education. I've had nothing but great experiences, from teachers to student services. The support team is usually kind and eager to assist with any academic or social adjustment issues. The lectures are delivered by qualified professors who have years of expertise and are up to speed on the latest research. Furthermore, the school provides all of the required amenities for students, such as computer laboratories, sports facilities, and scientific labs. Not to mention the numerous activities and events that encourage student invention and creativity. All of this contributes to my great overall experience at Zewail City of Science and Technology. I would very much recommend it to anyone looking to pursue higher education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
