St. Paul's University - SPU vs University of Eldoret vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Africa Nazarene University vs Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC

Side-by-side comparison from 59 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Graffins College (5.00)
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 0/6 categories
University of Eldoret: wins 0/6 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 0/6 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 0/6 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 0/6 categories
University of Rwanda - UR: wins 0/6 categories
Graffins College: wins 6/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Nairobi, Kenya
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Software Development
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
4.41
4.00
4.67
4.00
3.83
5.00
Win
Location
4.60
4.71
4.67
4.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
Professors
4.50
4.39
4.33
4.33
4.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.27
4.28
3.67
4.67
4.00
3.33
5.00
Win
Student life
4.71
4.53
4.33
4.67
3.00
3.50
5.00
Win
Value
4.73
4.67
4.00
4.67
4.50
4.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.58
4.31
4.00
4.67
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.
  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Strong academic foundation with practical application opportunities
  • +Diverse, welcoming campus community and good infrastructure
  • +Practical and engaging teaching methods
  • +Friendly and supportive facilitators
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are disappointing.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

This institution garners high marks for its excellent **Location** (4.5) and outstanding **Value** (4.67). **Professors** also receive strong recognition (4.33). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Student Life** (3.5) represent areas with lower ratings, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** are rated a solid 4, while **Facilities** score 3.83.

This institution garners excellent scores across the board. All aspects, from its impressive facilities and highly-rated professors to its vibrant student life and advantageous location, received a perfect 5. Accommodation and internationality were also rated exceptionally well, as was the overall value proposition. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, a strong academic foundation, and a diverse community. Some mention slow administrative processes.

With a single review, this university garners a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights engaging practical learning and friendly, approachable facilitators. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
78%
67%
67%
0%
50%
100%
4★
46%
22%
33%
33%
100%
33%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close