University of Rochester vs Media Training vs Fashion Retail Academy vs Joaquim Chissano University - UJC vs Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Rochester (4.10)
University of Rochester: wins 3/6 categories
Media Training: wins 0/6 categories
Fashion Retail Academy: wins 1/6 categories
Joaquim Chissano University - UJC: wins 0/6 categories
Eduardo Mondlane University - UEM: wins 1/6 categories
Universidade São Tomás: wins 1/6 categories
Polytechnic University Maputo - apolitécnica: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Rochester, New York, United States
4.10
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Business
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Creative Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.80
Not rated
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.20
3.00
2.00
Location
2.70
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
3.25
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.20
Win
4.00
2.00
Internationality
4.30
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.20
3.00
3.00
Student life
3.60
Win
Not rated
2.67
Not rated
3.40
3.00
2.00
Value
3.90
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
2.00
Accommodation
3.80
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong faculty knowledge and approachable professors
  • +Diverse and friendly student community with ample extracurriculars
  • +Excellent student resources and research opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and supportive tutors
  • +Feeling respected and treated as an adult

Nothing to show

  • +High academic quality and qualified professors
  • +Free tuition and accessible entry
  • +Good reputation and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are seen as inconsistent and lacking.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant concerns.
  • -Administrative issues and lack of support create frustration.
  • -Inflexible policies and limited course options are disliked.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative and communication problems.
  • -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
  • -Insufficient resources and support for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks for its **Internationality**, receiving an impressive 4.3. Professors are also highly rated at 4.0, with strong scores for Facilities and Accommodation (both 3.8), and a solid 3.9 for Value. Student Life also scores well at 3.6. The primary area for improvement identified is Location, which received a lower rating of 2.7.

Nothing to show

The university excels in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. **Facilities** are also a significant strength, rated highly. Conversely, **Student Life** is the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall in the middle, while **Professors** and **Internationality** are rated positively. This provides a mixed but generally favorable overview.

Nothing to show

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The highest marks were achieved in **Value** (4.6) and **Professors** and **Internationality** (both 4.2), indicating significant strengths in these areas. Conversely, the university received its lowest scores for **Accomodation** (3), followed closely by **Facilities** and **Location** (both 3.2). Student life received a moderate rating of 3.4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.1/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting course connection, research evidence, diverse friends, and helpful professors. Limited negative feedback (~0%) was noted regarding advisors and conflicting information.

Nothing to show

With only 3 reviews, feedback indicates a generally positive experience (~67% positive). One review highlighted tutors as a key positive aspect, praising their support and interactive teaching. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With a ~4/5 average rating, nearly all reviews praise the university's qualified staff and academic quality. Some mention challenges like course length and subject availability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
30%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
33%
0%
60%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
67%
0%
20%
100%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close