National Taiwan University - NTU vs National Chengchi University - NCU vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs Tamkang University vs National Taiwan University of Science and Technology - NTUST
Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic resources and quality faculty
- +Beautiful campus and diverse student opportunities
- +Welcoming and safe environment for international students
- +Diverse academic programs and flexibility for exploration
- +Dedicated and professional professors with high-quality teaching
- +Strong focus on social sciences, business, and international affairs
- +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
- +Engaging professors and insightful discussions
- +Supportive academic environment and flexible learning.
- +Opportunities for active participation and idea exchange.
- +Emphasis on practical application and industry relevance
- +Strong programs in technology, design, and management
- +Abundant corporate partnerships and internship opportunities
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Opportunities for engagement and idea exchange
- +Experienced and professional faculty
- +Flexible, unrestricted program arrangements
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Beautiful and vibrant campus environment
- -Poor communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from faculty is a major concern.
- -Students dislike the significant administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a major concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate teacher training and class management.
- -Lack of diverse student body hindering learning.
- -Inefficient use of class time with unproductive activities.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of clear communication cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient support staff lead to a less personalized education.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality is a recurring concern.
- -Disorganized administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources
- -Ineffective or irrelevant curriculum and teaching methods
This institution garners exceptional marks, with perfect scores in Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Accommodations also receive strong ratings at approximately 4.67. While Internationality is similarly well-regarded, Facilities represent the weakest area, rated at 4.33. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most aspects.
Remarkably high marks were achieved in several key areas, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest at 4.56. **Value** and **Student Life** also scored exceptionally well, both above 4.33. **Professors** received a strong rating of 4.33. **Facilities** represent the lowest rated aspect, coming in at 3.89, though still a respectable score. **Location** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range of the provided data.
Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.
This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, the institution faces considerable challenges in its **facilities** and **accommodation**, both scoring a low 2. Other areas, including **professors**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, fall within a moderate range, averaging 2.5.
This institution garners exceptional scores across all evaluated aspects. All areas, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a perfect rating of 5. There are no identified weak areas; every category demonstrates outstanding performance, indicating a consistently excellent university experience.
This institution demonstrates a very strong international outlook, earning a perfect score in that category. Professors, location, and accommodation also received favorable ratings, indicating solid performance in these aspects. However, facilities and student life are identified as areas with the most room for improvement, receiving slightly lower marks. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with distinct strengths.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect 5 out of 5. Internationality is also a strong point at 4. The primary area for improvement lies in its location, which received a lower score of 2, suggesting this is the weakest aspect of the university's offering.
All 6 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently highlight excellent academic resources, dedicated professors, and a beautiful campus environment. No negative feedback was reported.
All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight a strong academic atmosphere, diverse course offerings, and supportive professors, particularly in social sciences and business. The campus environment and opportunities for exploration are also praised.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.
Two out of three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 3/5. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and opportunities for discussion. One negative review, representing about 33.3% of feedback, points to inexperienced teachers and a lack of diverse classmates.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's emphasis on technology and practice, strong competitiveness in engineering, information, design, and management, and application-oriented courses with industry-experienced professors. Corporate cooperation and internship opportunities are also appreciated.
The university has a 5/5 average rating, with 100% positive feedback. Students praise its diversity and international student community, noting opportunities for idea exchange and engagement.
With a 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight flexible programs and friendly professors. The large, beautiful campus with vibrant flora and fauna is also praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
