United International Business Schools - UIBS vs University of Tokyo - TMU vs ISG International Business School vs Waseda University vs Tokyo University of Science
Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Practical application and real-world relevance
- +Small class sizes and individualized attention
- +Strong reputation and graduate success
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +World-class education and career opportunities
- +Motivated and diverse student body
- +Manageable workload with emphasis on presentations/attendance
- +Strong knowledge and skills for the professional world.
- +Effective and efficient teamwork and collaboration.
- +Ample facilities and support services
- +Diverse study abroad opportunities
- +Flexible and convenient self-study spaces
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of clear guidance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -A lack of resources and support for students is a recurring problem.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution garners near-perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and location, indicating exceptional strengths in these crucial aspects. Student life and internationality are also highly regarded, receiving scores of 4.5. Accommodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, rated at 4. The overall value is excellent, reflecting high satisfaction across multiple dimensions.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
With a robust average, this institution excels in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also garner significant praise. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement. Other areas such as Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value all received solid marks.
This institution excels in **Location** with a top score of 5, offering a desirable setting. **Professors** and **Value** also receive strong marks at 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the weakest aspects, both scoring a low 2. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall in the middle range with scores of 3.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving strong ratings. The **Value** proposition also appears to be a notable positive. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a considerably lower score. Other aspects, including **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, fall into a middle tier of performance.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
All three reviews are positive, rating the university 5/5. Students highlight practical learning, individual attention in small classes, and the university's strong reputation.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
Two out of three reviews are positive (approximately 67%), highlighting world-class education, career prospects, and a motivated student body. The average rating is 4/5.
This university receives a positive rating of 4/5 stars, based on one review. The student highlighted gaining valuable knowledge and skills in Marketing, and especially praised team collaboration for developing communication and problem-solving abilities. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, students highlight extensive facilities, ample study spaces, and global study opportunities. No negative comments were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
