University for the Creative Arts - UCA vs ICHEC Brussels Management School vs Miami University vs University of Sierra Leone - USL vs University of Sierra Leone, Fourah Bay College - USL (FBC)
Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong creative and innovative focus
- +Abundant specialized equipment and resources
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +High-quality, practical courses and supportive professors
- +International outlook and diverse student body
- +Numerous travel and internship opportunities
- +Beautiful campus and college town atmosphere
- +Excellent, helpful, and dedicated professors
- +Positive peer interactions and sense of community
- +Strong lecturers and flexible schedules
- +Supportive environment for business and personal growth
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Academically engaging programmes and supportive, knowledgeable faculty
- +Encouraging and student-friendly learning environment with a strong sense of community
- +Historic and beautiful campus atmosphere
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unprofessionalism from staff.
- -Frequent technical difficulties and unreliable class scheduling.
- -Lack of student focus and engagement from the university.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are often criticized for being ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates a notable strength in its **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.11. **Professors** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Opportunities for **Student Life** and the **Location** present areas for improvement, both scoring below 3.5. **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.
This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality** (4.43) and **Value** (4.29), suggesting a strong global presence and perceived worth. **Professors** also receive a commendable rating (4.14). Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Location**, both scoring 3.43. **Student Life** (3.57) and **Accommodation** (3.71) fall in the mid-range, indicating a solid but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in several key areas. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation all received impressive scores of 4.33. Value for money is also rated highly at 4. Professors are well-regarded with a score of 4. Areas for potential improvement include Location, scoring 3.67, and Internationality, which stands at 3.33.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a rating of 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and location, which are rated at 3 and approximately 3.67 respectively. Accommodations also received a respectable score of 3.75.
This institution garners exceptional marks in student life and accommodation, both receiving a perfect 5. Value and facilities are also highly rated at 5 and 4.5 respectively. While internationality and location are strong points at 4.5, professors are the weakest area with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, praising creativity, well-taught courses, supportive environment, and abundant resources. A small ~5% of feedback indicates unprofessionalism and poor teaching.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight excellent education, attentive professors, and high-quality, applicable courses. Opportunities for travel and an international outlook are recurring positive themes.
With 3 reviews and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is ~100% positive. Recurring themes highlight a beautiful campus and helpful professors, creating a rewarding academic and social experience.
With an average rating of 4/5 from four reviews, roughly 75% of feedback is positive. Students appreciate the business focus, flexible schedules, and professional, knowledgeable lecturers. There is no negative feedback provided.
With a 5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students highlight academically engaging programs, knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a student-friendly learning environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I found this to be a highly unprofessional university with very little interest in its students and their education. I undertook an MSc here and found the level of teaching to be extremely poor and not on par with the degree level. During my year at the university, I experienced the following: - The majority of lessons started off with technical difficulties that resulted in lessons losing half an hour. - Tutors scheduled classes and then did not show up for them. Tutors were significantly late to lectures and then laughed about it. Tutors took annual leave during term time. - Students were out of control and extremely disruptive, tutors did very little to resolve this issue and on numerous occasions laughed at and therefore encouraging their disruptive behaviour. - I had lessons that were scheduled to be 2 hours long with 45-minute breaks, reducing the lesson time significantly. - I attended lessons where the lecture was pre-recorded and played to us on the screen. I had to go to the university to watch a pre-recorded lesson over zoom. - Lectures were not present at their own classes and took them over zoom, again we had to attend a class to sit and watch a lesson over zoom. In some cases, it took a number of weeks before I saw the tutor physically present in the classroom. - The blended learning ended halfway through the year, and all students were required to attend all lectures in person with no exception. Which would have been fine had it not been extremely contradictory to the fact that half of the lessons were online classes as it was "more convenient” due to classes having 300+ students in with rooms only able to hold around 100. - I witnessed a significant number of students (I would estimate at around 50) being turned away from a class that they were scheduled to attend as the room held fewer students than were enrolled in the class , and the room was already full. I heard them being told they had to go to another room where the lesson was being streamed on a zoom call. I expressed concerns over marking as I felt that some of the feedback given was not in line with the work that was submitted. I felt that none of my queries were taken seriously and as a result of this, I feel that I have come away with less than I worked for. I found that this university often made mistakes regarding the publications of awards. My records were updated with a mark that was significantly lower than the one stated on the work and when receiving my final publication I was being given the wrong degree. I felt as though the requirement for an MSc from this university was extremely low and not on par with what I would expect from a post graduate degree. The national average for a MSc Dissertation is between 15,000 and 20,000 words. The maximum word count for my MSc dissertation was 4000 - this is less that I was required to write for my BA. When I raised my concerns to the university I felt that I was met with a very detached and defensive approach and I was made to feel as though I was at fault. After this interaction, I felt cast aside and treated very differently by staff members. I feel that I have spent in excess of £10,000 to learn absolutely nothing. I am very ashamed to say that I attended this university and plan to keep that fact as hidden as possible. If I could go back I would avoid UCA and attend a faculty that takes education seriously.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
