Aalborg University - AAU vs Landshut University vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI

Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: STMIK Triguna Dharma (5.00)
Aalborg University - AAU: wins 0/7 categories
Landshut University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Sumatera Utara: wins 0/7 categories
Medan Area University - UMA: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI: wins 0/7 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/7 categories
STMIK Triguna Dharma: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Landshut, Germany
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
4.31
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.28
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.33
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.18
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.26
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.18
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.10
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and enthusiastic teachers
  • +Inclusive and welcoming environment
  • +Research opportunities and guidance
  • +Outstanding learning climate, professors, and learning success
  • +Easy to get to know many people due to campus size
  • +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
  • +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management systems cause significant frustration.
  • -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Inconsistent quality of instruction and curriculum concerns arise.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates a solid overall performance. Its highest-rated categories include Professors (4.33) and Facilities (4.31), indicating strengths in these core academic and infrastructural aspects. While still favorable, Accommodation (4.10) received the lowest score among the surveyed areas, suggesting it could be an area for further development. The university also received strong marks for Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all falling between 4.18 and 4.28.

This university presents a uniform performance across all evaluated aspects. With zero ratings in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, there are no distinct areas of strength or weakness to highlight. The institution's standing is consistent across every surveyed metric.

This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~100% positive sentiment from 42 reviews, students highlight dedicated teachers, engaging courses, and excellent research opportunities. The university is praised for its inclusive and welcoming environment for international students.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, this university is highly recommended. Students praise the outstanding learning climate, professors, and learning success. The campus size facilitates making new connections.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.

Rating distribution
5★
31%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
67%
100%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
2%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Master degree 2008-2010

I studied my master degree at Aalborg University from 2008-2010. It was the first time my master degree was offered and as always; a new education can struggle to find its feet. So it was very broad topics with the notice; that you could become anything you liked. I had to find my own path in this, but I like the fact that you are able to impact and create your own expertise within a broad field through the semester Projects and problem-based learning. It wasn't as hard as I had imagined (coming from a different type of education). I liked the freedom and requirement of independence that the program offered. I had a good experience; I know that program I studied have developed a lot since then and I think it has been for the better; some of the structure and topics we lacked are now a part of the program.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close