Universidad Austral De Chile - UACH vs The University of Notre Dame vs Limkokwing University of Creative Technology vs Abdelmalek Essaâdi University vs Universidad Catolica Nordestana - UCNE

Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The University of Notre Dame (4.70)
Universidad Austral De Chile - UACH: wins 1/6 categories
The University of Notre Dame: wins 4/6 categories
Limkokwing University of Creative Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Abdelmalek Essaâdi University: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Catolica Nordestana - UCNE: wins 0/6 categories
Higher Institute of Education Sciences: wins 0/6 categories
Potchefstroom Academy and SAAHST - Potch Academy : wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Advertising
Best programme: BBA in Economics and Finance
san francisco de macoris, Dominican Republic
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Fragrance and Beauty
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
4.33
Win
4.10
3.33
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
1.00
3.67
4.40
4.40
3.00
Not rated
2.00
Professors
3.00
4.67
4.40
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.00
4.67
Win
4.50
3.17
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
5.00
Win
4.00
4.50
3.17
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Value
2.00
4.67
Win
4.50
3.50
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
1.00
4.50
Win
2.89
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Strong sense of community and supportive environment.
  • +Personalized attention and meaningful connections with staff.
  • +Valued feedback and genuine care from professors.
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty fostering academic and personal growth
  • +Diverse and creative learning environment encouraging innovation and collaboration
  • +Relevant curriculum and modern facilities preparing for career challenges
  • +Strong academic programs and diverse courses
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Positive academic environment and personal growth opportunities
  • +Good campus, service, and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging lectures and passionate faculty
  • +High-quality training and learning experiences
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a major disappointment.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and unclear expectations are prevalent.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and limited resources.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of parking.
  • -Delayed responses and absent leadership from student affairs and administration.
  • -Poor administrative processes and management.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hindered the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff were common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling unsupported.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This university is highly regarded, with exceptional scores for Professors, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a near-perfect 4.67. Accommodations also scored very well at 4.5. Student Life and Facilities are rated positively at 4 and 4.33 respectively. The weakest area of the university appears to be Location, with a rating of 3.67.

Overall, this institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a 4.5 rating. Professors and Location also rate highly at 4.4. However, Accomodation stands out as a significantly weaker area, with a rating of 2.89. Facilities received a respectable 4.1.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive profile. Its strongest areas are **Location**, with a high score of 4.4, and **Professors**, rated at 4. The weakest aspects, however, are **Accomodation** at 3 and **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both at 3.17. Facilities also sit in the mid-range at 3.33.

Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most categories. Student life emerges as its strongest aspect, scoring a 4 out of 5, indicating a vibrant and engaging campus experience. Conversely, its weakest areas are facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and value, all receiving a rating of 3. This suggests areas for potential improvement to further enhance the student experience and offerings.

Nothing to show

Academic strengths are evident, with professors receiving a perfect score of 5. Value for money also stands out at 4. However, the university faces challenges in its location and student life, both scoring a low 2. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, as is internationality. Overall, the institution excels in teaching quality but has areas needing significant improvement in campus experience and accessibility.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.67/5. Recurring themes highlight a strong sense of community, friendly and approachable staff, and personalized attention from professors.

With 90% positive feedback and a 4.5/5 average rating, students praise the university's supportive staff and creative learning environment. Some noted minor concerns regarding classroom facilities.

With an average rating of 3.83/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching academics and diverse courses. ~17% of feedback is negative, citing administrative issues and slow student affairs response.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university is positively viewed, with praise for campus, service, and infrastructure. Online classes during COVID presented some challenges for analysis.

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating 4/5. It praises engaging lectures, campus passion, and quality training. A minor suggestion was made for updating machinery and improving cleanliness in the wellness center.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
67%
60%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
33%
30%
33%
100%
0%
100%
3★
100%
0%
10%
17%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close