Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP vs Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE vs International School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP (5.00)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Nove de Julho - UNINOVE: wins 0/6 categories
International School of Management: wins 2/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade de Araraquara - Uniara: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor's Degree in Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.29
4.64
4.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.50
4.86
4.64
4.78
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.83
4.43
4.82
4.67
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.33
3.71
4.82
Win
4.67
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.83
4.33
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.83
4.71
4.73
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
3.50
4.64
Win
3.22
4.00
Not rated
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Renowned academic quality and top-tier professors
  • +Excellent infrastructure and practical learning experiences
  • +Welcoming environment for international students
  • +High-quality education, excellent professors, and relevant course content.
  • +Modern facilities and accessible learning environment.
  • +Affordable tuition and value for money.
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

  • +High didactic standards and educational quality
  • +Blend of traditional and problem-based learning
  • +Sufficient anatomy lab resources
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently lacking or unclear.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -A perceived lack of value or outdated curriculum is a recurring concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional acclaim for its professors, student life, and perceived value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Facilities and location also scored highly, indicating a well-rounded and desirable environment. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still received a solid rating. Internationality is also a strong point, reflecting a diverse campus.

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas. Location stands out as its strongest attribute, achieving the highest rating, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student life and Facilities also received very positive feedback. However, Accomodation presents the weakest area, with a considerably lower score compared to others, and Internationality also shows room for improvement.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution shines brightly in several key areas. Professors are rated a perfect 5, alongside its location and overall value for money, indicating exceptional quality and appeal. Student life also garners a strong score of 4. However, the university's accommodation is a significant area for improvement, receiving a low rating of 1. Facilities and internationality are moderately rated at 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise excellent infrastructure, top-tier professors, and the university's strong academic reputation and practical learning opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, approximately 89% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, high-quality courses, and facilities, exceeding expectations. A small percentage of feedback noted potential program optimization.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

The university is well regarded with ~100% positive feedback, praised for its didactic standards, educational quality, and sufficient anatomy labs. However, ~26% of feedback notes deficient classroom infrastructure and outdated furniture.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
78%
64%
67%
50%
0%
0%
4★
0%
11%
36%
33%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
the university is among the top 10 in latin america.

The university is wonderful and has a wonderful infrastructure, but policies for access to education and dissemination of scientific knowledge are still lacking for non-university people. The university still functions as a "bubble".

Nothing to show

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close