Leiden University vs Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University vs Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce - Ehc vs Midlands State University vs Supershine University
Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Exceptional academic quality and renowned professors
- +Supportive and friendly student community
- +Comprehensive programs and student support services
- +High-quality and affordable education
- +Supportive faculty and practical learning experiences
- +Personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Fosters growth and independence through challenging, self-reliant learning.
- +Top-tier lecturers and strong academic programmes
- +Diverse student body and international exposure
- +Opportunities for growth and career preparation
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
- +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Educational quality and professor engagement are lacking.
- -Perceived lack of equal opportunity and support for diverse student needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of communication and unresponsiveness from staff are major complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent scores across most aspects, with location being its standout strength. Facilities, student life, and internationality also receive very positive feedback. The value proposition is rated a solid 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Professors' ratings are also respectable, though slightly lower than the overall average.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving ratings of 4.11. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are areas that appear to be less strong, with both scoring 3.44. Other aspects like Student Life, Value, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating a generally well-rounded profile with room for improvement in specific amenities.
This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, alongside a top rating for value. Student life and accommodation are also strengths, both receiving a solid four. Conversely, the university's location received a zero, indicating a significant area for improvement. Facilities also received a moderate rating of three.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Value** and **Location** standing out as particularly high-rated areas. **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Professors** also received very positive scores, indicating a well-rounded experience. The **Facilities** are rated well, though slightly lower than these top-performing categories. The **Internationality** score represents the weakest area in this assessment.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
Nothing to show
With ~82% of 78 reviews being positive, students praise high-quality learning, renowned professors, and comprehensive programs. A small percentage (~3.9%) express dissatisfaction with bureaucracy and teaching quality.
With ~56% positive reviews, students highlight learning opportunities, supportive teachers, and good value education, particularly in agriculture and biochemistry. Some mention a need for more faculty empathy and less engaging campus life.
The university receives positive feedback, with one review rating it 4 out of 5 stars. This positive sentiment represents 100% of the feedback, highlighting a good learning environment that fosters independence and hard work.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.65 average rating. ~94% of feedback highlights top-tier lecturers, a nurturing learning culture, and diverse student experiences. A small amount of feedback (~6%) notes challenges with accommodation security and booking policies.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.
Nothing to show
This faculty in particular only serves the interest of the upper middle class and the rich. It screams DEI and inclusivity, but the message remains hollow, especially since most of these groups include individuals, who have said xenophobic and other discriminatory things about other students and staff in the past. DEI should celebrate all different diversities and not just a single issue one. There is an extrem lack of equal opportunities its always just opportunities for the same old people. How can the same person hold 3-4 positions in the faculty, and yet call the faculty a heaven of "equal opportunities"? To no surprise its just the already wealthy who get every opportunity. They eve created a grassroots funding system where the same old rich students, received yet another opportunity.... Its so cool that you give already rich students more money, instead of addressing structural issues within the faculty. And the worst thing is you leave traces of evidence everywhere, you even suck at false advertising. Theres a lot of hypocrisy in leiden and many students of vulnerable backgrounds are being ignored, slandered and even held back career wise. Yet the perpetrators can still remain in the drivers seat. The perpetrators are both students and staff. The administration/study advisors is terrible and quite frankly useless since everything has just become automated emails, there are no mentors and supervisors only like to serve students who are wealthy. A student could die and they would not care if they are still alive. The building is pretty but it had some leaks in the past. Overall after 2 suicide attempts thanks to their constant harassment and slander. I would give this faculty less than one star. Leiden archaeology is only for the rich conservatives who had failed so hard in their own economic system, that they had to enter a public university (with no entry barriers) because they couldn't compete with people that applied to go to Oxford or Cambridge . It truly is a neoliberal university.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
