EADA Business School vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Universidad de Zaragoza vs Universidad San Jorge vs CESTE Escuela Internacional de Negocios
Side-by-side comparison from 237 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, experienced professors and practical, relevant programs.
- +Strong international network and diverse student body.
- +Central Barcelona location and supportive staff.
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +High-quality teaching and supportive professors
- +Diverse educational opportunities and practical learning
- +Welcoming environment and positive student life
- +Attentive and supportive teaching staff
- +High-quality facilities and resources
- +Excellent student support and guidance
- +Excellent, supportive teaching staff
- +Extensive career opportunities and personal growth focus
- +Constructive, collaborative atmosphere
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -The program content, particularly regarding sustainability, did not meet expectations.
- -Inflexible processes and arbitrary grading practices are frequently criticized.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Outdated facilities and uncomfortable furniture.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff.
- -Slow language learning pace compared to other institutions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues, including slow procedures and unaddressed incidents.
- -Outdated curriculum that does not align with industry demands.
- -Lack of post-graduation support, specifically regarding labor market assistance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across its key attributes. Location stands out as its strongest area, achieving a near-perfect rating. Student life and internationality also rank highly, reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus. Accommodation, while still respectable, presents as the area with the lowest rating, indicating potential room for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in its offerings.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
Student life stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving an impressive 4.71. Conversely, internationality received the lowest score at 3.57, indicating room for improvement in this area. Other strengths include professors (4.41), while facilities, accommodation, and value also garnered solid ratings above 4.0.
Assessments across key university metrics reveal a consistent score of zero in all areas. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value based on the provided ratings. The data presents a uniform lack of positive or negative distinction in any surveyed category.
This institution garners strong marks for its professors, rating 4.33, and facilities, at a solid 4. Student life and internationality both received moderate scores of 3. Its weakest areas, however, are location and student life, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are also rated in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (97.5%), praising excellent teachers, practical programs, and professional recognition. Some minor issues were noted regarding administrative flexibility and program delivery specifics.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
Around 96.4% of reviews are positive, highlighting exceptional student life, talented personnel, and educational opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback mentions issues with specific facilities or administrative processes.
All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise attentive professors, high-quality facilities, and excellent support, with no negative feedback reported.
With ~67% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.33/5, students praise outstanding professors and a fulfilling, demanding education. However, ~33% note outdated curricula and institutional shortcomings regarding post-graduation support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
From a purely academic perspective, the experience is great. The professors are super good and the small class sizes really make the learning experience very personalised. The program has been carefully curated to be relevant and is very practical - I feel like I am learning things I would actually use in my professional career. Apart from this, the students come from really different backgrounds and cultures and it really helps you learn more about how things are different in other countries. Overall, it's been a fantastic experience so far and I highly recommend it!
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Llevo un año en esta Universidad y sin duda no me arrepiento de haberla escogido. Es una universidad pública, que como muchas otras concede becas de acceso. Se ofrece gran variedad de grados tanto de ciencias sociales, biosanitarias, tecnológicas y letras. Además se da la oportunidad de participar en actividades extrauniversitarias como debates, conferencias, cursos, deportes, política universitaria... Es una muy buena opción.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
