Islamic University of Indonesia - UII vs University of Sanata Dharma vs Indonesian Nuclear Technology Polytechnic - Poltek Nuklir vs Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta University - UMY vs Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Yogyakarta
Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, well-maintained facilities and up-to-date learning resources
- +Inspiring and cooperative lecturers with comfortable classrooms
- +Supportive Islamic environment promoting harmony and tolerance
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs in nuclear technology
- +Student-friendly environment in Yogyakarta
- +Excellent laboratory facilities
- +Practical curriculum and knowledgeable faculty
- +Collaborative environment and modern facilities
- +Valuable career services support
- +Engaging curriculum with practical applications
- +Diverse extracurriculars and organizations
- +Supportive academic environment
Nothing to show
- +Hands-on practical learning
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Good facilities and resources
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Ineffective or unengaging teaching methods are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of necessary resources and support is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
This university garners excellent ratings across key aspects. Facilities stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Professors, student life, and perceived value are also highly regarded. Location, accommodation, and internationality are consistently rated well, though slightly lower than the top-performing categories. Overall, the institution presents a very positive and well-rounded profile.
Nothing to show
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution shines particularly brightly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks. Student life and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a positive campus environment. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which received moderate scores. The overall value proposition appears strong.
Exceptional marks were awarded across all evaluated aspects. The university achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a uniformly outstanding experience with no specific areas requiring improvement or standing out as significantly stronger than others.
An excellent overall profile emerges from these university ratings. The institution excels in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** and **Value** are also exceptionally strong areas, marked by high marks. In contrast, **Facilities** is the weakest aspect, though still rated positively. **Professors** and **Accomodation** also demonstrate very solid performance.
Nothing to show
This institution receives perfect scores across all evaluated metrics. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas; every aspect surveyed meets the highest possible standard.
All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently praise the excellent facilities, including journal access and technology resources. Lecturers are described as kind, fun, cooperative, and inspiring.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university garners high praise for its student-friendly environment and strong academic programs. Positive comments highlight excellent laboratory facilities and specialized nuclear-related education.
With a single review, the student experience is rated a perfect 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. This suggests a highly satisfactory educational environment.
Students report an enriching and pleasant experience, highlighting strong academic programs and numerous extracurricular opportunities. The supportive environment and diverse studies are frequently praised, with minimal mention of less-than-ideal facilities.
Nothing to show
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It highlights extensive learning, enjoyable hands-on practice, and helpful, nice teachers.
Being a student at UII seems to be a matter of prestige because the tuition fees are quite expensive. However, the supporting facilities and teaching materials make the word "price" completely irrelevant. Supporting facilities such as international journals, free accounts to access Microsoft Offices, Spotify, computer lab space and WiFi with fairly fast speeds are provided. Teaching materials are always of international standard with case studies that increase knowledge at every class meeting. It's not just about learning activities, but facilities to support student creativity such as a podcast room, filming equipment, content studio, and editing software are also provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show