Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS vs HELBUS Helsinki School of Business vs LAB University of Applied Sciences - LAB
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
- +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
- +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +Modern facilities and updated resources
- +Personalized guidance and support for academic progress
- +Motivating and helpful staff
- +Opportunities for quick graduation
- +Supportive environment for idea development and learning
- +Good facilities and professional support for studies and career goals
- +Flexible study options and access to technology
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors and excellent learning environment
- +Practical, project-based, and industry-oriented coursework
- +Strong research focus and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching staff create a negative academic experience.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered by instructors.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support from faculty create a negative environment.
With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.
Exceptional scores were awarded across every aspect of the university. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no discernible weak areas, suggesting a consistently high-quality educational environment.
Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Facilities stand out with an impressive 4.8 rating. Student life and internationality also score highly at 4.2, supported by solid accommodation at 4.4 and good overall value (4.0). The primary area for improvement appears to be professors, receiving the lowest rating at 3.6. Location also registers a moderate score of 3.8.
Nothing to show
With a robust average score of 4.1, the university demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors** (4.6) and **Facilities** (4.4). Areas receiving slightly lower, though still solid, marks include **Location** and **Internationality**, both at 3.8. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, scoring 4.2 respectively, with overall value sitting at a respectable 4.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights helpful staff, advice, opportunities, and motivational support. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students praise learning opportunities, valuable knowledge, and practical skills. Facilities and equipment, including 3D printers and design software, are highlighted.
Nothing to show
Students highly recommend LUT University, highlighting supportive professors, modern facilities, and a strong research/sustainability focus. ~80% of feedback is positive, praising practical coursework and a calm academic environment. A small amount of feedback noted limited job support for international students.
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.
This school was very good and helpful, I wanted to graduate quickly and they have helped me achieve this, they gave me advice and opportunities and they were checking in on my progress. Very motivating to be surrounded by the staff.
LAB has one of the most modern, smart and inclusive university facilities in Europe. The campus houses a diverse set of meeting rooms, working spaces that are professionally suitable for students of every faculty. The nursing students have got impressively updated equipment and labs, and so do the people of Design Institute, Engineering, and Business. The facility encourages learning, but it also puts an emphasis on relaxing and maintaining balance. LAB has built an exercise point, along with equipping billiard table, mini basketball game, and 2 ping pong tables indoor. Also, the campus is open 24/7, accessible always with a student or staff card. The university also owns a holistic range of academic journals, books, articles in its physical and digital libraries. Making a library card, loaning and returning a book is as easy as ever. The lecturers for courses taught in English could be better, in my opinion. They are very helpful and responsive, but at times, lectures are somewhat boring.
Nothing to show
From my perspective, my experience at LUT University has been positive overall. I especially liked the strong focus on project-based and practical coursework, which helped me gain real-world skills. The academic environment is calm and research-oriented. However, I felt that the university is not very supportive when it comes to helping international students find jobs. Overall, I would recommend it to students who are independent and proactive.
