Escuela de Diseño CEI - CEI vs University of Engineering and Technology - NED vs Midwestern State University - MSU Texas vs John Brown University - JBU vs University Institute of Great Schools of the Tropic - IUGET
Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent and knowledgeable teachers
- +High-quality training and programs
- +Effective virtual learning environment
- +Practical curriculum with current industry focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Research opportunities and funding
- +Welcoming and diverse student community
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Engaging campus atmosphere and activities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging and holistic learning experiences
- +Strong faculty and peer interactions
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and events
- +Experiential learning and knowledgeable facilitators
- +Dynamic programs for professional development
- +Supportive peer learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues make the student experience frustrating.
- -Course content does not align with advertised practical applications.
- -A decline in staff cordiality and support after enrollment occurs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and lacks practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often disappointing.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the real world.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support causes significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and outdated curriculum are persistent problems.
Overall, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. It excels in providing outstanding accommodation and a prime location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life and professor quality are also highly lauded. The weakest area, while still strong, is internationality, though it remains a positive aspect. Value for money is rated exceptionally highly, as are facilities.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** and **Value** standing out as its strongest attributes, both scoring above 4.5. **Professors** also receive strong positive feedback. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated slightly lower, though still a respectable 4.16. **Internationality** is rated at 4.1. The overall feedback suggests a well-regarded university with exceptional offerings in specific domains.
This institution garners excellent scores, particularly for its **facilities** (4.83), which stand out as its strongest attribute. **Value** (4.67) and **accommodation** (4.33) also receive high marks. Conversely, **student life** (3.8) is rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects, suggesting this area could be a focus for improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, with outstanding scores for location and student life, alongside a perfect rating for value. Professors also receive a commendable evaluation. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present significant weaknesses, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is identified as the sole area of concern, receiving the lowest possible rating.
Demonstrating exceptional strengths, the university received perfect scores for value and notably high ratings for facilities, location, and student life. Professors and accommodation received solid scores, falling just below the top tier. Internationality also scored well, indicating a diverse and welcoming environment.
Feedback is split, with ~50% of reviews being negative. Positive feedback highlights excellent teachers and good training, while negative reviews cite disappointing practical application and unhelpful management after payment.
With 22 positive reviews, students highlight a practical curriculum, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and an excellent research environment. The average rating is 4.65/5, with approximately 0% negative feedback.
The university is praised for its welcoming atmosphere and diverse student body. Faculty and staff are consistently noted as helpful and supportive, enhancing the academic experience. Students achieve high grades and gain extensive knowledge. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the SIES MBA program received a perfect 5/5 rating. The student praised its enriching curriculum, faculty, and diverse peers, suggesting more industry-focused events would improve the experience. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 based on 3 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students praise the experiential learning, helpful facilitators, and solid knowledge acquisition. Some mention a need for more residences and dining facilities.
I have started studying a master in this center. They sell you the course as something very practical that will help you find work in the chosen field. I am currently finishing my first module and I am quite disappointed. I arrived eager to learn and practice. The first two or three weeks were very good. Everyone was very cordial and friendly, and the teacher was very motivated. All that changed to the third week after they sent us a survey to give our opinion about the course, the teacher and the school. This teacher is very unmotivated and does not follow his own curriculum. We are a week away from finishing the course and we have not given all the material that is requested to carry out the project, and many classes are based on comparing other web pages with theirs or criticizing people who are dedicated to creating websites. They have also put me a lot of problems in the secretariat. If you are going to enroll in this school, since it is cheaper than many others, keep in mind that if you do not ask for the labor guarantee, they will NOT inform you about it. And if you sign it, you have to do it before you start the classes. Many people did not know that and they have lost it. Also if you are subject to the labor guarantee you have a number of days left, if you spend that day even if you have proof you lose the labor guarantee. I want to think that things will improve with the next module and that there will be other more professional and dedicated teachers. At the moment this is my opinion. If you are thinking about enrolling in CEI, review all the clauses before paying. They will not refund your money under any circumstances.
As an aspiring architecture student, I believe every single day is a new day with new targets and achievements. The University I'm studying at has multiple facilities, although it's not among top world universities, but the faculty of this University is cooperative, they encourage new students and help them stand on their feet. To anyone who is disheartened in not being able to get in one of the top universities either by personal issues or by not being able to achieve good grades, don't be so negative, because every day when we wake up, we are given a new opportunity. A little hardwork and going around exploring stuff can help you earn your dream goals. For me this new environment is like a completely different world, where I get an opportunity to learn new things about everyone around me, and get a chance to explore the world with the eyes of these great teachers
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
