University of Montenegro vs Holmesglen Institute of TAFE vs Forman Christian College vs Thomas More University of Applied Sciences vs Universidad Nacional Experimental de los Llanos Centrales Romulo Gallegos - UNERG
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging professors with real-world experience.
- +Comprehensive curriculum offering theoretical and practical knowledge.
- +Authentic cultural and historical learning experiences.
- +Flexible program options and multiple intake sessions
- +Recognition of the institution's reputation and quality
- +Support for combining multiple academic interests
- +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
- +Lively campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
- +Emphasis on critical thinking and practical learning.
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world experience
- +Accessible, supportive lecturers and small class sizes
- +Modern campus and international environment
- +Experiential learning and knowledgeable facilitators
- +Dynamic programs for professional development
- +Supportive peer learning environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible policies and poor communication are significant problems.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated or inadequate.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff was a problem.
- -Unfair grading and unsupportive instructors.
- -Poor academic programs and high dropout rates.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support causes significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and outdated curriculum are persistent problems.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university is highly rated for its **location** (4.29) and **professors** (4.13), reflecting a positive academic and environmental experience. **Value** also scores well at 4.0. However, **internationality** is a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating of 2.63. Other aspects like **student life** and **accommodations** are moderately rated at 3.75, with **facilities** at 3.25.
This university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all receive high marks of 4 out of 5. The sole area showing a slight dip is location, rated at 3, suggesting it may be less of a standout feature compared to the other well-regarded components.
This institution receives particularly high marks in several key areas. Its location and professors are lauded as exceptionally strong points, closely followed by student life and value. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest rated aspect, while facilities and internationality also show room for improvement.
The university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with location and internationality standing out as its highest-rated aspects. Student life and professor quality also received commendable scores. Accommodation, while still positive, emerged as the area with the lowest rating compared to others. Value and facilities also scored well.
Demonstrating exceptional strengths, the university received perfect scores for value and notably high ratings for facilities, location, and student life. Professors and accommodation received solid scores, falling just below the top tier. Internationality also scored well, indicating a diverse and welcoming environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With 4 out of 8 reviews being positive (4-5 stars), students express happiness with their degree experience and comprehensive curricula. They also appreciate engaging professors and departments located in historically rich areas. Some wish for updated course content and more practical experience.
With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The sole reviewer was impressed by the university's ability to offer a packaged degree combining two areas of interest, alongside multiple intake sessions.
Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising the strong academic reputation, supportive faculty, and lively campus. Approximately 0% of feedback expressed concerns.
University reviews are predominantly positive (approx. 98%), praising the practical, project-based learning, accessible lecturers, and new campus facilities. A small amount of negative feedback (approx. 2%) mentions unfair grading in specific programs.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 based on 3 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students praise the experiential learning, helpful facilitators, and solid knowledge acquisition. Some mention a need for more residences and dining facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I’ve just finished my degree in International Tourism & Leisure at Thomas More, and honestly, it’s been an amazing experience. The program gave me a solid understanding of the tourism and hospitality industry and helped me develop both practical and theoretical skills. What I loved most was the international approach and the hands-on projects with real companies, which really prepared me for the professional world. The professors were always supportive and passionate about what they teach, which made a huge difference. On top of that, I met incredible people from all over the world and made friends for life, which made the experience even more special. Thanks to this degree, I’ve gained not only knowledge but also great opportunities to grow and start my career in tourism. Definitely recommend it to anyone interested in this field!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
