Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs Admiral Makarov National University of Shipbuilding - NUOS vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs DMI St John the Baptist University - DMISJBU
Side-by-side comparison from 28 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Impressive, research-engaged professors and high-level theoretical preparation.
- +Good programs and supportive class teachers.
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Quality teaching and dedicated, hardworking lecturers.
- +Good facilities, well-equipped library, classrooms, and laboratories.
- +Strong, well-structured academic programs and extracurricular activities.
- +personalized attention and professor accessibility
- +flexible scheduling options
- +strong business, law, and public affairs programs
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and unengaging curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution presents a uniform set of ratings, with no particular area standing out as exceptionally strong or weak. All surveyed aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, have received identical scores. This suggests a consistent, though unexceptional, performance across the board, offering no clear strengths or weaknesses to highlight based on the provided data.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Overall, this institution receives a solid academic and lifestyle assessment. Facilities, location, and internationality stand out with the highest scores, all around 3.86. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest rating at approximately 3.57. Areas like professors, student life, and value maintain respectable scores in the mid-to-high 3.7 range.
With excellent scores in several key areas, this institution shines particularly brightly for its professors and accommodation, both earning a perfect five. Students also appreciate its international outlook and strong student life, with facilities and overall value receiving solid four-star ratings. The location is its least celebrated aspect, marked by a three-star score.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
With a single review, this university receives a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights impressive professorial staff and high-level theoretical preparation, though it notes inadequate practical training.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.43/5 stars. Students praise qualified lecturers, well-equipped facilities, and supportive learning environments. Some mention a need for updated technology resources.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a sold educational experience in fields like business and law, appreciating small class sizes, personalized attention, and flexible scheduling.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
