Universidad de Granada - UGR vs Norwegian University of Science and Technology - NTNU vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Kwara State University - Kwasu
Side-by-side comparison from 192 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Solid academics and engaging professors
- +Vibrant city life and affordability
- +Positive student-teacher relationships and community
- +strong academic programs & practical exposure
- +vibrant social life & student organizations
- +knowledgeable professors & engaging lectures
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Passionate, knowledgeable faculty & strong academic foundation
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities including extensive library
- +Focus on career readiness & practical skills development
- +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
- +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
- +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Poor teaching quality and outdated curriculum
- -Disorganized and student-unfriendly academic processes
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frustrating.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles and stress.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.
Nothing to show
Student feedback indicates a university with exceptional strengths in **Student Life** (4.625) and **Location** (4.425). Areas for improvement, while still moderately rated, include **Facilities** (3.55) and **Professors** (3.575). The university also scores well in **Internationality** (4.25) and **Accomodation** (3.92), with a solid rating for **Value** (3.875).
This institution garners strong approval, particularly in student life, its strongest area. Facilities and location also receive high marks. Conversely, internationality stands out as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. Accommodation, professors, and overall value are rated positively, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Value** standing out as the strongest area, receiving a high rating. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received excellent scores, indicating robust campus resources and a vibrant student experience. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. **Internationality** also falls into a mid-range performance, suggesting room for growth in global engagement.
Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.
Nothing to show
About 53% of reviews are positive, praising solid academics, professors, and the enriching city experience. Around 15% are negative, citing disorganization, administrative issues, and poor staff empathy. The average rating is 3.44/5.
With a 4.44/5 average from 9 reviews, ~89% are positive. Students highlight excellent education and social life, especially for engineering. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
Nearly 100% of 36 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.22/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, modern facilities, and academic growth. Some note limited resources as a minor area for improvement.
Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.
Nothing to show
The academic content of the master has been very interesting to me and I think I have learned a lot. Coordination I think it can improve since in the subjects taught by more than one teacher I have identified a lack of coherence. In relation to the practices, several problems have arisen since, when working with the juvenile protection or penal system, on several occasions it has taken more than the appropriate period to accept the practices. Also the list of centers that were offered last year, at which point I had to choose, this year they were not offered. However, the content of the master seems very good to me.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Kwasu is a great citadel of learning, with high morals and academic diligence. The calendar is fast and they are fast becoming one of the best in the nation. It has the biggest library in West Africa and I recommend it for future students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
