Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO vs EBS European Business School vs Nordakademie Graduate School vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs Madurai Kamaraj University

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Vilnius University of Applied Sciences - VIKO: wins 0/2 categories
EBS European Business School: wins 2/2 categories
Nordakademie Graduate School: wins 0/2 categories
Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM: wins 0/2 categories
Madurai Kamaraj University: wins 0/2 categories
Curtin University Mauritius - CURTIN: wins 0/2 categories
Mauritius Institute of Education - Mie: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Applied Computer Science
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
3.60
2.33
3.00
Location
4.54
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.20
3.67
4.00
Professors
4.29
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.20
4.33
4.00
Internationality
4.50
5.00
2.00
5.00
3.60
2.33
2.00
Student life
4.57
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
2.33
4.00
Value
4.50
5.00
3.00
5.00
4.20
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.08
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
3.40
2.67
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, applied learning focused on real-world skills
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable teaching staff
  • +Opportunities for success and career preparation
  • +Enthusiastic and supportive professors
  • +Outstanding international environment
  • +Friendly and welcoming student community
  • +Supportive and caring professors
  • +Excellent campus facilities and opportunities
  • +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
  • +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
  • +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
  • +High-quality, knowledgeable, and experienced faculty.
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with theoretical and practical learning.
  • +Engaging campus life and active student community.
  • +Career preparation and employability support
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
  • +Professional and accommodating lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Negative interactions with instructors and poor course structure are frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication breakdowns and poor responsiveness from staff create problems.
  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
  • -Lack of student life and campus events.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
  • -Outdated or inadequate facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with Student Life and Location receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and Internationality also rank very favorably. While Accomodation is rated lower than other categories, it remains a solid score, indicating an overall positive university experience. Professors' ratings, while good, are the lowest among the surveyed aspects.

Across the board, this institution receives perfect scores in all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This suggests an exceptionally strong offering with no discernible weaknesses according to these ratings. The university appears to excel uniformly, providing an outstanding experience in every dimension.

This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors and location. Student life and facilities also receive strong commendations. However, its internationality score indicates a notable area for potential improvement, while the value proposition is rated moderately. Accommodation also scores well, contributing to a generally positive, albeit uneven, assessment.

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

Performance across various aspects of university life shows a generally positive trend. The institution excels notably in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value**, all receiving 4.2. Student life is also well-regarded at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring 3.6, and **Accomodation** which is rated at 3.4.

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating. Conversely, areas such as facilities, student life, and internationality received notably lower scores, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects. Accommodation and value are rated moderately, while location falls somewhere between the strongest and weakest categories.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students highlight the practical curriculum, supportive faculty, and opportunities for success. No negative reviews were provided.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. Students highlight an enthusiastic and supportive faculty, and outstanding internationalism.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise the campus, friendly atmosphere, and dedicated professors, though some mention the expense.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

Students praise knowledgeable and supportive faculty, an updated curriculum, and active campus life. This positive sentiment (~100%) is reflected in the high average rating of 4.2/5.

Two positive reviews highlight employability services and relevant program content. One negative review expresses frustration with a lack of campus events, representing approximately 33% of feedback.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
53%
100%
0%
100%
20%
0%
0%
4★
40%
0%
100%
0%
80%
67%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Experience

The program has been tailored to accommodate the ever-changing world of tech and fully equips pupils with the relevant industry specific knowledge they require as well as a broadened perspective on a plethora of subjects through electives and workshops. The campus is very small and there are very few activities to participate in. This makes the school-life balance hard to maintain as the semester is very intensive and requires consistent study. The lecturers are very professional, accommodating, eager to help and approachable.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close