The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - PolyU vs HAN University of Applied Sciences vs Champlain College vs South Eastern Kenya University - seku vs Gustavo A Madero Technological Institute II - ITGAM II
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class programs and practical learning
- +Extensive internship and career opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life and convenient location
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
- +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.
- +Excellent, relevant, and timely career preparation
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Strong, award-winning program content
- +Conducive and enjoyable learning environment
- +Quality education
- +Peaceful and focused setting
- +Strong academic programs and practical preparation
- +Supportive and effective professors
- +Excellent facilities and extracurricular opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Engaging subjects and knowledgeable professors
- +Solid theoretical background
- +Lack of practical experience
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities are a significant concern.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
- -Limited course variety and a lack of engaging learning experiences are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause problems.
- -Facilities and resources are inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are outdated.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of clear communication and organization
This institution garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.91. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received strong ratings at 4.45. Areas rated slightly lower include **Professors** and **Accomodation** at 4.36, and **Internationality** at 4.27. The university demonstrates a good overall value, scoring 4.55.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.
Remarkably strong scores characterize this institution, particularly for its professors, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4, while internationality and value stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. The university excels in core academic and living aspects, with no areas falling below a solid 4.
Overall, the university showcases a strong profile with excellent scores in Facilities and Student Life, both receiving a perfect 5. Value also stands out with a 5-star rating. However, the Location presents a significant weakness, scoring a low 2. Professors and Internationality are rated moderately at 4 and 3 respectively, with Accomodation also falling in the middle at 3.
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, with Professors earning the highest rating. Student Life and Location are also well-regarded, alongside Value. Facilities and Internationality are rated moderately well. The weakest area of performance is Accomodation, which received the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
With a stellar rating of 5, student life stands out as the university's strongest asset. Conversely, facilities, professors, and accommodation all received a moderate rating of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location, internationality, and value are rated positively at 4, suggesting a good overall experience for students.
With ~83% positive feedback and an average of 4.5/5, reviews highlight strong academic quality, professional advantages, and diverse campus life with ample opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the university's ability to prepare them for life and their careers, highlighting valuable professors and excellent program-specific knowledge.
The single review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students praise the conducive learning environment and enjoyable experience. No negative feedback was provided.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight engaging programs and knowledgeable professors.
I SKIP CLASSES! I'm currently enrolled at the hong kong polytechnic university.... That is how my review should start rationally, right? But, here is a thing - I'm enrolled in the university and the last time I have been to lectures was half a year ago! It is supposed to be my 2nd year now, but due to the protests, coronavirus I'm on the online teaching for half a year!!!
The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
