Universidad Internacional de la Rioja - UNIR vs Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Nuevo Casas Grandes - ITSNCG vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI
Side-by-side comparison from 32 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, theory-practice blend curriculum
- +Flexible online learning for work-life balance
- +Supportive, experienced faculty
- +Good teacher formation
- +Infrastructure improvements
- +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
- +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
- -Students are frustrated by a lack of practical application and disorganized, repetitive content.
- -There are significant administrative and management issues, including pressure tactics, unclear conditions, and miscommunication.
- -Concerns are raised about misleading program information, undisclosed costs, and a failure to deliver promised credentials.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of engagement and effectiveness in teaching is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Analysis of the university's ratings reveals that **Professors** are the strongest area, earning a score of 3.62. The university also performs well in **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring above 3.2. In contrast, **Facilities** emerge as the weakest point, with a rating of 2.88. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are also areas with moderate scores, falling just below 3.
This institution presents a uniform profile, with no single area standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every aspect surveyed, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. Consequently, there are no specific strengths or weaknesses to highlight based on these evaluations.
This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.
~74% of 26 reviews are positive, with students appreciating practical, theory-based programs and flexible online formats. ~31% of reviews express dissatisfaction, citing disorganization, theoretical content, and undisclosed costs.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, one out of two reviews is positive. Students praise infrastructure and teacher formation, though some note insufficient equipment for practices. Negative feedback is minimal.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.
First, since I asked for information for the ELE Master, I had the advisor constantly pressuring me to decide, to enroll, to PAY, to sign... she would not leave me alone for a day. Up to that point, I didn't like it, but I thought, well, it was their way of selling, 1st red flag. 2nd red flag: When signing the registration on the platform, they asked me if I agreed with the conditions, but the conditions did not appear anywhere, to which I told the advisor that I could not sign a document where they asked me if I agree to the conditions that are not explained to me. She responded by saying that there was "nothing strange", and that the conditions were that I was going to study at the university, and I was surprised that a supposedly serious institution believes that one must accept the conditions that they tell you orally, is it Seriously?, 3rd red flag. However, I wanted to continue trusting (silly me) and I signed. However, I told advisor Pilar Fuentes that, as a suggestion, the conditions should be explicitly described in that document, to which she did not respond anything, nor to my question about what the next step was. Two days passed and still no response. I asked him again what the next step was and three days later he responded: "Hello, how can I help you?" As if he didn't know me, I repeated the question again, which remained unanswered for two more days, that is, 5 in total. (4th red flag), clearly showing that this university only cares about PROFIT. Once they take money from you, they forget. During those days, another person already sent me the "20 installments" in which I had to pay, which surprised me again because no one asked me how I was going to pay. When I asked this person about it, he told me I had SIGNED for 20 installments... (5th red flag). What other surprise were they going to come up with that I had signed? But of course, it was my mistake to accept what the advisor told me. When I wrote to this advisor again to tell her that she couldn't believe that she still hadn't answered me after 5 days and that she wasn't going to give another cent to this university, she just reacted with a not very credible excuse. I demanded the return of MY money (290 USD) and despite the fact that I explained to them in the discharge department that I had completely lost confidence in the institution due to lack of professionalism and transparency, and despite the fact that I offered to give them details of what happened, little They didn't care and told me they wouldn't give me ANYTHING back. In other words, I confirmed the advisor's attitude, but that this is a problem not only for her, but also for an institutional problem. The least you expect when you complain about a terrible service is that the person providing said service is a little embarrassed and at least returns the money that is not theirs. But hey, let it benefit them. As for me, I will tell all my colleagues about this terrible experience so that they can look for a university that is worth it. And I hope my review helps others not to fall into the trap.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show