University of Agriculture of Makurdi - UAM vs Cambridge Regional College vs Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC vs Federal University Of Agriculture - FUAM vs Benue State University

Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi - Jostum (4.50)
University of Agriculture of Makurdi - UAM: wins 0/6 categories
Cambridge Regional College: wins 0/6 categories
Islamabad Medical and Dental College - IMDC: wins 0/6 categories
Federal University Of Agriculture - FUAM: wins 3/6 categories
Benue State University: wins 0/6 categories
St Mary's University, Twickenham: wins 3/6 categories
Joseph Sarwuan Tarka University Makurdi - Jostum: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Animal Science
Cambridge, The United Kingdom
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
London, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science in Strength and Conditioning with Distribution
Best programme: Agricultural Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
1.00
Not rated
4.43
3.80
5.00
Win
3.00
Location
3.00
2.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.08
4.00
3.40
Professors
4.20
1.00
Not rated
4.43
4.12
5.00
Win
3.83
Internationality
3.40
1.00
Not rated
4.14
Win
3.27
4.00
3.33
Student life
3.60
1.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
3.92
4.00
3.00
Value
4.40
1.00
Not rated
4.57
4.00
5.00
Win
4.17
Accommodation
3.00
1.00
Not rated
4.00
3.60
4.00
2.83
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong agriculture focus and practical skills
  • +High quality education and dedicated staff
  • +Research and innovation opportunities
  • +Engaging teaching and supportive instructors
  • +Relevant and practical curriculum
  • +Vibrant campus community and resources

Nothing to show

  • +Strong technical education with practical application
  • +Supportive and accessible lecturers
  • +Emphasis on student well-being and continuous growth
  • +Supportive and accommodating lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and infrastructure
  • +Valuable education and opportunities for growth
  • +Supportive professors and helpful resources
  • +Inspiring professional development opportunities
  • +Dedicated lecturers and challenging academics
  • +Conducive learning environment and discipline
  • +Supportive transportation facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum structure create problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Negative interactions with staff are common.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources frustrate students.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from the administration creates confusion.
  • -The curriculum feels outdated and does not adequately prepare students for real-world challenges.
  • -Staffing shortages and overcrowded, unhygienic hostels.
  • -Disruptions from lecturer strikes and attendance issues.
  • -Poor class scheduling and outdated infrastructure.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a mixed picture across various aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Value** at 4.4 and **Professors** at 4.2, indicating high satisfaction with both the cost-effectiveness and the quality of teaching staff. Conversely, the **Location** and **Accomodation** received the lowest scores, both at 3, suggesting these are areas with the most room for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range.

This institution received overwhelmingly positive ratings, with a perfect score of 1 in most assessed areas. Its strongest performance lies in **Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value**, all earning top marks. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still good, rating was **Location** at a 2. Overall, the feedback suggests a highly-regarded university with exceptional offerings in academic and student experience aspects.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong scores across most metrics. Value and Location stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both achieving 4.5 or above. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category at 4.0. Facilities and Professors are also well-regarded, scoring 4.43. Student Life and Internationality are rated moderately well, with Student Life at 4.33 and Internationality at 4.14.

Performance metrics reveal a university that excels in its academic offerings and overall environment. Professors receive the highest marks, closely followed by location and value. However, internationality and accommodation present areas for improvement, scoring the lowest among the evaluated categories. Facilities and student life also show solid, above-average results.

This institution scores exceptionally well, with perfect ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors**, reflecting outstanding academic and infrastructural resources. The university also excels in **Value**, earning a full five stars. Areas of **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all strong, receiving four-star assessments, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded experience.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile. Its strongest aspect is the value it offers, scoring highest among all categories. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other metrics, including facilities, student life, professors, location, and internationality, fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience across these areas.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting excellent education, discipline, and practical agricultural skills. Limited negative comments mention large campus size impacting transportation.

One review provided, rating 1/5 stars. This review was entirely negative, describing the college as "really bad" concerning people, studies, and service. The reviewer found the staff "very angry and bad."

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.29/5, reviews highlight strong technical foundations, supportive professors, and excellent educational activities. Some minor challenges with transportation were noted.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising learning, lectures, and infrastructure. A small portion of feedback, around 11.5%, mentions issues like staff shortages, classroom limitations, and facility upkeep.

The single review highlights exceptional professor support and inspiring university-organized events. Students appreciated the study resources and comfortable campuses, despite noting small, uncomfortable classrooms. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with approximately 100% positive sentiment.

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight excellent lecturers, a conducive learning environment, and challenging courses that foster discipline. Some mention difficulties with accommodation and financial needs.

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
0%
29%
27%
0%
50%
4★
60%
0%
0%
71%
35%
100%
50%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
27%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
1★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My academic experience in the university

The class scheduling in the university was poor as post graduate students and undergraduate students often clash due to lack of classrooms and poor class scheduling. Also the unconcerned attitude of some of the lecturers towards attending class (often skipping classes at will without prior notices to the students). Academic activities was further interrupted by lecturer strikes due to poor working conditions and pay. However, the school has a pool of well trained professors that has in-depth knowledge in their respective fields

Nothing to show

Accomodations

Accomodation facilities are not enough with poses a significant threat for students this makes the private off campus housing expensive and too exorbitant to access. Transportation facilities is something that I must commend

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close