Hochschule Osnabrück vs Northumbria University vs University of Bolton vs Tanauan School of Fisheries - TSF vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi

Side-by-side comparison from 142 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Stavanger (5.00)
Hochschule Osnabrück: wins 1/7 categories
Northumbria University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Bolton: wins 0/7 categories
Tanauan School of Fisheries - TSF: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Industrial Rodolfo Loero Arismendi: wins 0/7 categories
University of Kabianga - UoK: wins 1/7 categories
University of Stavanger: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Osnabrück, Germany
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Education
Newcastle, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
111 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Cloud and Network Security
Tanauan City, Philippines
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
stavanger, Norway
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Urban Sustainability Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.42
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
4.56
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Professors
4.50
Win
4.14
4.19
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
4.00
Internationality
4.00
4.35
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
3.71
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
4.49
Win
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.00
Value
4.00
4.11
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.50
4.03
3.48
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful and dedicated staff & faculty
  • +Comfortable, modern facilities and dream library
  • +Great city for university experience
  • +Strong academic programs and career guidance
  • +Welcoming environment and student support services
  • +Hands-on learning and innovative opportunities
  • +Passionate and supportive lecturers
  • +Good course content and practical learning
  • +Excellent facilities and campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills development and hands-on experience
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Affordable education and flexible living costs
  • +Interactive learning & diverse perspectives
  • +Practical insights for studies & career
  • +Supportive instructors
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant concern.
  • -The program structure is irrelevant and not practical.
  • -The course content does not lead to job opportunities.
  • -Lack of direction and unsupportive teaching staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and communication problems cause frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of personalized attention hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support leads to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks for its facilities and professors, both receiving a commendable 4.5 out of 5. Student life, location, and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The area requiring the most improvement is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5, suggesting room for development in this aspect.

Regarding its evaluation, this institution excels in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also scored very well. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the area with the lowest reported score. **Professors** and **Value** are rated moderately, while **Internationality** falls slightly above average.

Performance is notably strong in Facilities, achieving a rating of 4.41. Value and Location also received high marks, at 4.32 and 4.24 respectively. Student Life and Internationality are rated solidly, around 4.09 and 3.91. The area with the lowest score is Accomodation, at 3.55.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student life** and **accommodation** also score well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **internationality** is the weakest aspect, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with a few standout features and one area that warrants attention.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect score of 5. **Value** also stands out with a top rating. Areas for potential improvement, while still strong, include **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, each scoring a commendable 4 out of 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a great city for university, comfortable and modern buildings, and helpful professors and staff. The library is particularly praised.

With ~74% positive feedback, students praise innovative opportunities, strong support services for mental health and careers, and engaging hands-on learning. A small percentage of negative reviews highlight concerns about program structure and job readiness.

With an average rating of 4.38/5, ~90% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and good learning experiences tailored to industry standards. There is minimal negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 7 reviews are positive, with students praising the acquisition of skills, affordability, and knowledgeable, approachable lecturers. The average rating is 4.14 out of 5, with no negative feedback reported.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, this university garners strong approval. Students highlight engaging interactive discussions and supportive instructors. The course provided valuable insights and practical ideas for the future.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
39%
48%
0%
0%
14%
100%
4★
0%
41%
43%
0%
0%
86%
0%
3★
50%
14%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

My time at Northumbria

Overall, my time at Northumbria was ok. Not great just ok. My time was influenced by the COVID outbreak and so my final year was all online. Through my second and final year there was a lack of support from tutors. Not only that I had extenuating circumstances which were ignored when appealing my final grade.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close