University of Greenwich - UoG vs Alexandria University - AU vs Schiller International University vs Swiss Education Academy vs Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Side-by-side comparison from 123 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur (5.00)
University of Greenwich - UoG: wins 1/7 categories
Alexandria University - AU: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Swiss Education Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Federal do Rio Grande do Sul: wins 0/7 categories
University of Kabianga - UoK: wins 2/7 categories
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
66 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advanced Product Design Engineering and Manufacturing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Montreux, Switzerland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.26
Win
3.06
3.92
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.52
4.18
4.93
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
3.00
Professors
4.34
3.89
4.64
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
3.00
Internationality
4.56
3.43
4.93
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.71
4.00
Student life
4.25
3.14
4.15
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Value
4.24
3.83
4.29
Not rated
Not rated
4.43
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.84
2.97
3.62
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and vibrant campus atmosphere
  • +Diverse and enriching academic programs
  • +Strong academic programs and expert professors
  • +Practical training and project-based learning
  • +Vibrant student life and supportive community
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical skills development and hands-on experience
  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers
  • +Affordable education and flexible living costs
  • +Flexible learning environment with supportive faculty
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and college experiences
Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and insufficient lecturing staff.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative problems.
  • -Disruption from strikes and feeling that tuition fees were not justified.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of practical relevance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues significantly detract from the student experience.
  • -Overcrowding negatively impacts lecture delivery and student achievement.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates uncertainty.
Rating summary
What students say

A review of university ratings indicates a strong performance in internationality, with a score of 4.56, and location, rated at 4.52. Professors also received a favorable assessment at 4.34. The facilities and student life categories scored similarly around 4.25, with value also within this range. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which received a score of 3.85.

Overall, the university garners favorable ratings, with its **location** being the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.18. Professors and value also received solid scores. Conversely, **accommodation** emerged as the weakest point, with a rating of 2.97. Facilities and student life are rated moderately, while internationality falls within a similar range.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating. **Student life** and **accommodation** also score well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **internationality** is the weakest aspect, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with a few standout features and one area that warrants attention.

This university presents a mixed but generally positive profile. Student life stands out with a perfect score, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Facilities and internationality are also strong points, both receiving solid 4 ratings. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, scoring only a 2. While professors and location are rated moderately, the overall value proposition remains competitive at a 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all student feedback is positive (~98%), highlighting excellent faculty support, diverse student life, and top-notch facilities. A small portion (~2%) mentions organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics and vibrant student life. ~11% of feedback expresses concerns about outdated materials, heavy workloads, and administrative issues.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

All 7 reviews are positive, with students praising the acquisition of skills, affordability, and knowledgeable, approachable lecturers. The average rating is 4.14 out of 5, with no negative feedback reported.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students praise the experienced faculty and acknowledge a balance between academic opportunity and personal freedom.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
14%
71%
0%
0%
14%
100%
4★
32%
49%
21%
0%
0%
86%
0%
3★
11%
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
11%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Alexandria university - Egypt

Alexandria university is one of the largest universities in Egypt, it' very good university, it's accredited, with friendly professors, almost contain all of the specializations and branches, but it may contain a lot of students which make it crowded.

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close