emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESDES School of Management vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale vs ISARA

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ISG Luxury Management (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML: wins 0/7 categories
ESDES School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale: wins 0/7 categories
ISARA: wins 0/7 categories
ISG Luxury Management: wins 5/7 categories
Digital College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: MBA Master of Business Administration
Lyon, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.54
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.05
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.56
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.40
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +Practical application and industry relevance
  • +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
  • +Supportive environment and accessible services

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world projects and professional standards
  • +Strong organization and diverse programs

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations regarding assignments and grading.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engaging course material.
  • -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a highly supportive and engaging environment. Professors were rated very highly, suggesting strong academic guidance. While internationality was also good, it was the weakest area relative to the otherwise perfect scores. Overall, the university offers significant value, with a strong showing in most aspects of the student experience.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback, students praise practical, real-world projects and good organization. A minor suggestion for more core subject hours was noted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
29%
67%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
11%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close