University of St. Thomas vs Katowice Business University - KBU vs Ramaiah College of Law vs International University of Rabat - UIR vs Kirinyaga University

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of St. Thomas (5.00)
University of St. Thomas: wins 1/6 categories
Katowice Business University - KBU: wins 1/6 categories
Ramaiah College of Law: wins 3/6 categories
International University of Rabat - UIR: wins 0/6 categories
Kirinyaga University: wins 1/6 categories
Northwest University, Kano: wins 0/6 categories
Dusit Thani College - (DTC: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Best programme: Advanced Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration and Bachelor of Legislative Law
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: Education
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.00
4.33
3.67
4.15
3.00
Not rated
Location
2.33
4.00
4.67
Win
3.33
4.30
3.00
Not rated
Professors
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
4.33
4.60
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
4.67
Win
4.50
4.00
4.33
3.90
4.00
Not rated
Student life
2.67
5.00
Win
4.33
3.67
4.53
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.33
4.00
4.33
4.33
4.70
Win
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.00
4.67
Win
3.00
4.15
2.50
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Advanced lab facilities and research centers
  • +Strong theoretical and practical learning balance
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Friendly and approachable lecturers
  • +International friendships and cultural experiences
  • +Accessible professors
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Excellent professional development opportunities
  • +Broadening of opportunities and challenging activities
  • +Dynamic professors and empowering learning
  • +Global exposure and international focus
  • +Professional development and industry connections
  • +Strong student support and timely graduation
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive teaching staff
  • +Technological advancement and diverse leadership
  • +Supportive and caring staff and administration
  • +Encouraging academic experience and effective teachers
  • +Conducive learning atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Unresponsive administrative and management issues plague students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication causes confusion.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -There are concerns about curriculum relevance and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are inconsistent, with many finding it irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication leads to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are problematic.
  • -Limited career support and poor job prospects are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in **Internationality**, earning a score of 4.67. Its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are also highly rated, all coming in at 4.33. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** represent the university's weaker aspects, with scores of 2.33 and 2.67 respectively. **Accommodation** falls in the middle with a rating of 3.

This institution exhibits a robust overall profile, with student life standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Internationality also scores exceptionally high at 4.5. Conversely, accommodation is identified as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Other aspects like facilities, professors, location, and value are all rated solidly at 4, indicating consistent quality in these domains.

A generally positive university profile is evident, with professors receiving the highest possible rating of 5. Location and accommodation also score strongly. Areas with slightly lower, though still good, scores include internationality. Facilities, student life, and value are all rated consistently well, indicating a solid all-around experience.

This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all scoring an impressive 4.33. Student life and facilities also received solid ratings at 3.67. The weakest area appears to be **Accommodation**, with a rating of 3, and **Location** also scores moderately lower at 3.33. Overall, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic and global aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in academic quality, with professors receiving a near-perfect rating of 4.6 and value for money scoring an outstanding 4.7. Student life also scores highly at 4.53. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include internationality at 3.9, and facilities and accommodation both at 4.15.

The university demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors receive an excellent rating of 4.5, closely followed by strong scores for Value (4.5) and Student Life (4). Internationality also scores well at 4. The weakest area of concern is Accommodation, with a rating of 2.5, while Facilities and Location are rated moderately at 3.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews were positive, giving a 5/5 average rating. Students highlighted world-class lab facilities, including advanced microgrid research, and a strong curriculum balancing theory and hands-on learning. Professors were described as knowledgeable and supportive.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight friendly lecturers and making international friends as positive experiences. Some mention professors being helpful, though online class organization has been a minor concern.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with students praising the supportive environment, helpful faculty, and exceptional opportunities for professional and personal development.

With an average rating of 4.67/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students commend modern infrastructure, diverse community, international partnerships, and professional development opportunities. Some mention demanding workloads and high tuition as minor drawbacks.

With 18 out of 20 reviews being positive (90%), students highly praise the university's student administration, learning experiences, and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong support from staff and lecturers, alongside a positive academic experience and conducive learning atmosphere.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
67%
67%
70%
50%
0%
4★
0%
50%
33%
33%
20%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Quality education

This university is the best place to be, the student admin coordination is so amazing,, it is rare to hear students complaining about not graduating because they missed some marks. I can recommend this university again and again.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close