Latvia University of Agriculture - LLU vs Centre College vs Kent State University - KSU vs University of Mauritius - UOM vs Morehead State University - MSU

Side-by-side comparison from 26 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Latvia University of Agriculture - LLU (4.70)
Latvia University of Agriculture - LLU: wins 1/7 categories
Centre College: wins 0/7 categories
Kent State University - KSU: wins 5/7 categories
University of Mauritius - UOM: wins 0/7 categories
Morehead State University - MSU: wins 0/7 categories
Boland College: wins 0/7 categories
Tula State University - TulSU: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Danville, Kentucky, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Kent, Washington, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Media
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: B.Sc. in Political Science: Global Politics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.83
Not rated
4.25
Win
3.57
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
3.50
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.21
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.40
Not rated
4.25
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.50
Win
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.50
Not rated
4.25
Win
3.62
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and relevant course content
  • +Beautiful campus and historic atmosphere

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, expert faculty dedicated to student success
  • +Strong academic programs with emphasis on experiential learning and research
  • +Vibrant and diverse campus community with good facilities
  • +Practical, engaging programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life with diverse student body and activities
  • +Modern facilities and opportunities for research

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging subjects and knowledgeable professors
  • +Solid theoretical background
  • +Lack of practical experience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a persistent concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues frequently cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Limited career support and unclear future prospects leave students feeling unsupported.
  • -Poor lecturer attitudes and intimidating behavior.
  • -Inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary rule enforcement.
  • -Lack of acknowledgment for university oversights.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of clear communication and organization
Rating summary
What students say

Academia shines with a strong 4.5 rating for professors, indicating excellent teaching quality. Students also perceive good value, scoring a 4. However, the university's weakest areas lie in student life and facilities, both receiving lower scores of 3.4 and 3.83 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across most assessed areas. Location, Internationality, and Value are standout categories, all receiving a near-perfect score of 4.5. While Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation also score highly at 4.25, these areas represent the only slight deviations from the peak ratings.

This academic institution receives strong marks in several key areas, with Location standing out as its highest-rated aspect. Professors and Student Life also scored well, indicating positive experiences in these departments. Conversely, Internationality presents as the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, with Value falling somewhere in the middle.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a stellar rating of 5, student life stands out as the university's strongest asset. Conversely, facilities, professors, and accommodation all received a moderate rating of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location, internationality, and value are rated positively at 4, suggesting a good overall experience for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.71/5 average from 7 reviews, students highly praise the university. Recurring themes include supportive and knowledgeable faculty, a beautiful historic campus, practical studies, and well-equipped facilities. There is no negative feedback reported.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5 and ~100% positive feedback, reviewers highlight the university's strong faculty, diverse programs, and valuable learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable lecturers, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. A small minority of ~7% expressed challenges with lecturer attitudes and inconsistent rules.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being favorable. Students highlight engaging programs and knowledgeable professors.

Rating distribution
5★
71%
0%
25%
14%
0%
0%
0%
4★
29%
0%
75%
57%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
21%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close