University of Belgrade vs Capital School of English vs Bennington College vs Arab Open University vs University of Mauritius - UOM
Side-by-side comparison from 154 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Balanced theory and practical application for industry readiness.
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff.
- +Diverse and high-quality academic programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
- +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
- +Practical, engaging programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse student body and activities
- +Modern facilities and opportunities for research
- +Comprehensive and engaging curriculum
- +Supportive faculty availability
- +Opportunities for athletic participation
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Strong foundational business knowledge
- -Administrative and organizational issues are prevalent.
- -Professors lack motivation and student engagement.
- -Curriculum is often irrelevant, overwhelming, and outdated.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
- -Poor lecturer attitudes and intimidating behavior.
- -Inconsistent and seemingly arbitrary rule enforcement.
- -Lack of acknowledgment for university oversights.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Poor administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of effective teaching and course structure.
Among the evaluated aspects, location stands out as the strongest with an impressive rating of 4.61. Student life also scores highly at 4.34. Conversely, internationality presents the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.22. Facilities and accommodation are mid-range at 3.69 and 3.58 respectively, while professors and value show solid performance around the 4.0 mark.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.
This academic institution receives strong marks in several key areas, with Location standing out as its highest-rated aspect. Professors and Student Life also scored well, indicating positive experiences in these departments. Conversely, Internationality presents as the weakest area, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, with Value falling somewhere in the middle.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback with consistent ratings across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving a perfect score of 5. Conversely, while still strong, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all received a solid rating of 4, indicating areas that are well-regarded but could potentially see further enhancement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving strong ratings. However, significant areas for improvement are evident in **accommodation** and **internationality**, which received the lowest scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also scored poorly. The university achieves a middling **value** rating.
Nearly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting balanced theory/practice, industry preparation, and exciting university life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated materials and disengaged professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable lecturers, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus atmosphere. A small minority of ~7% expressed challenges with lecturer attitudes and inconsistent rules.
With one review, the National University of Costa Rica earns a 4/5 average. The feedback highlights a rewarding experience with a challenging yet engaging curriculum and supportive faculty. An athletic scholarship was also mentioned.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise knowledgeable and supportive professors. They highlight a positive learning environment and valuable foundational business knowledge gained.
I am studying at the Medical Faculty of the University of Belgrade, majoring in Integrated Academic Studies in Medicine. What bothers people the most is what direction it is, how long the studies last and how long they study. My course lasts 6 years and after those 6 years it is calculated as if you have completed basic and master studies (6 0), hence the name of the integrated study in the name of the course. After completing 6 years, you acquire the right to the title of doctor of medicine, after which you can opt for further education or specialization that you want, but do not have to, you can work as a general practitioner. About 500 students enroll in my major each year, with all the list moves. In addition to my major, there are also basic academic studies of nursing, but also medicine in English, which is a more expensive variant of my major and costs 7000eur per year. At the medical school, non-budget students are a rarity, because if you give year after year, you are on a budget, because when you pass the conditional exams for the next year, you have fulfilled the right to budget funding. For self-financing students, the tuition fee is around 127,000 dinars. The faculty is not very organized and requires a lot of personal commitment. Professors are also doctors, so professorship is not their primary job, which is reflected in most cases in their lack of interest, but if you show interest, they are always ready to meet you and help as much as they can and know. In general, the concept of the faculty is different from the others, because it contains a lot of practical subjects, and attendance at all forms of teaching is mandatory, which can be exhausting, but it lasts. The first three years of study are the so-called preclinical years, where obstetric subjects are taught, which provide some fundamental knowledge and general principles of structure and function of the human body, but every year there is one clinical subject that requires work with patients in hospital. The next 3 years are clinical and the exercises are reduced to working in the hospital and learning the practical part. I would recommend to anyone who likes that vocation to enroll in my college, but not if they are not sure, because to the people who enroll, because they did not know what else or at the urging of someone else, the collapse will be a real torture. The faculty is located within the Clinical Center of Serbia, so it is well connected with all parts of the city. What is a problem is the distance to the nearest canteen. It takes about half an hour to get to the first canteen, which is usually not enough in the break between lectures for lunch. In addition to the educational part, the faculty also offers a handful of sports and entertainment activities, as well as its own cafe (which in my opinion is important). Parties, excursions, but also serious trips are often organized, as well as the famous Medicinijada, which is organized every year in Montenegro.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show