Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Kozminski University vs Civitas University vs Zabielski Foundation

Side-by-side comparison from 126 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kozminski University (4.60)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 1/7 categories
SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH: wins 0/7 categories
Kozminski University: wins 6/7 categories
Civitas University: wins 0/7 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw Management University - MANS: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Warsaw, Poland
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
54 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Warsaw, Poland
4.30
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: International Relations
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.07
4.51
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
Location
4.73
Win
4.67
4.08
4.71
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
Professors
4.36
4.23
4.57
Win
4.21
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Internationality
3.77
4.07
4.57
Win
4.36
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
Student life
4.18
4.13
4.48
Win
3.93
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Value
4.36
4.17
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Accommodation
3.82
3.64
4.16
Win
3.36
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Strong reputation and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring community and passionate lecturers
  • +Solid foundation in economics and useful resources
  • +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
  • +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
  • +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
  • +Flexibility in study options
  • +Affordable tuition

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Bureaucracy and administrative issues cause significant difficulties.
  • -Online administrative services are problematic and unhelpful.
  • -Excessive control over student organizations is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of practical application and career support
  • -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
  • -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and large class sizes.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

This university garners positive feedback across most areas, with **Location** being the standout strength at 4.67. **Professors** (4.23) and **Value** (4.17) also received high marks. The **Accomodation** rating, however, stands out as the weakest point at 3.64, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are generally well-regarded.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.

This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.

Nothing to show

Student feedback indicates a university excelling in **Student Life**, scoring a notable 4.4. Areas receiving average ratings include **Location** and **Internationality** at 3.6. Conversely, the university's **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are its weakest points, all averaging 3.4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching, a good reputation, and career opportunities. A small ~3% of feedback mentions bureaucracy and less useful online resources.

Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.

Nothing to show

Four out of five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Recurring themes include appreciation for practical learning and flexibility. There is no negative feedback in the provided reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
35%
43%
65%
57%
0%
20%
0%
4★
52%
50%
31%
29%
0%
60%
0%
3★
13%
3%
4%
7%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Quality Education and campus life

Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close