Warsaw University of Technology vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University vs Zabielski Foundation

Side-by-side comparison from 90 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/5 categories
University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE: wins 0/5 categories
Kozminski University: wins 1/5 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 4/5 categories
Zabielski Foundation: wins 0/5 categories
Warsaw Management University - MANS: wins 0/5 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.25
4.51
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
Location
4.73
2.75
4.08
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
Professors
4.36
4.50
4.57
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Internationality
3.77
4.25
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
Student life
4.18
4.50
4.48
4.50
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Value
4.36
4.25
4.50
4.50
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Accommodation
3.82
4.00
4.16
4.50
Win
Not rated
3.40
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
  • +Supportive professors and direct student contact
  • +Accessible location near Warsaw
  • +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
  • +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
  • +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world application of knowledge
  • +Flexibility in study options
  • +Affordable tuition

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of practical application and career support
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and large class sizes.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.

Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

Nothing to show

Student feedback indicates a university excelling in **Student Life**, scoring a notable 4.4. Areas receiving average ratings include **Location** and **Internationality** at 3.6. Conversely, the university's **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are its weakest points, all averaging 3.4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

Nothing to show

Four out of five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Recurring themes include appreciation for practical learning and flexibility. There is no negative feedback in the provided reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
35%
33%
65%
100%
0%
20%
0%
4★
52%
50%
31%
0%
0%
60%
0%
3★
13%
17%
4%
0%
0%
20%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

My vision

University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.

Nothing to show

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close