Mataram University - Unram vs Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre - UNEXPO vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram vs Universidad de Los Andes - UANDES
Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and complete study programs
- +Improved facilities and infrastructure
- +Strong graduate employability
- +High academic standards and rigorous curriculum
- +Supportive and experienced faculty for professional development
- +Specialized engineering programs with excellent facilities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Excellent study plans and preparation for students
- +High-quality campus facilities and laboratories
- +Personal treatment and professor interactions
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
- -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources frustrate students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of effective communication creates uncertainty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.
This institution presents a notable profile, with its strongest area being **Value** at 4.67. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Accommodation** represent its weakest points, both scoring a 3. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university receives excellent marks for its **professors (5/5)**, indicating a highly regarded academic staff. Facilities are also strong, with a rating of 4.5. Conversely, **student life (3/5)** and **location (3.5/5)** present areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Accommodation and internationality are rated a solid 4, while value sits at 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the academic excellence, skilled teachers, and specialized engineering programs. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5 and 0% negative feedback, student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students praise the excellent study plans and European-level campus facilities, noting a high level of personal treatment from professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show