Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa vs HEC Montreal vs FH Joanneum University of Applied Sciences vs National University of Food Technologies - NUFT vs Federal University of Lafia - FULafia

Side-by-side comparison from 30 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: HEC Montreal (4.40)
Federal Polytechnic Nasarawa: wins 0/7 categories
HEC Montreal: wins 3/7 categories
FH Joanneum University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Food Technologies - NUFT: wins 0/7 categories
Federal University of Lafia - FULafia: wins 1/7 categories
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences: wins 3/7 categories
Enugu State College of Health Technology Oji River: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Montreal, Canada
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: BA (hons) Sociology and Criminology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.49
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Not rated
Location
3.50
4.14
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.75
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.42
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.71
4.38
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.75
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.14
4.53
Not rated
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.29
4.54
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.33
4.16
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic and practical training
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment with good resources
  • +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
  • +Strong career preparation and job market focus
  • +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Academic quality and excellent professors
  • +Conducive learning environment with fun campus life
  • +Skill development for professional excellence

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor university system and learner attention.
  • -Insane pressure and workload.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews, with student life and value being its strongest points. Facilities and professors also receive solid marks. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which is rated lower than other aspects. The university presents a generally positive experience, with a particular emphasis on student engagement and return on investment.

This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Professors and accommodation are exceptionally strong points, receiving high marks. The university also scores well in internationality and value. Conversely, location is the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Student life and facilities are rated solidly in the mid-range, indicating good overall performance with room for improvement in specific aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.14 average rating, ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A smaller portion (~14%) noted issues with proper documentation.

With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic quality, innovation, and a conducive learning environment. A smaller ~25% of feedback mentions a poor system and intense workload.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
61%
0%
0%
75%
0%
0%
4★
14%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
14%
17%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The specificity of talent building

My school is really a great one , they help in building talents and makes interaction with student easy , I will recommend everyone to attend as even everyday they are bringing in better innovation and creativity

Supply Chain Logistic

HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

It was fast and so easy to navigate

It is where dreams come true, I learned all the skills and Qualities I from fulafia. I really encourage those up and coming to apply whether B.sc,MSC or PHD. I majored in sociology and overtime during my stay at the university was overwhelming because I had the best of best that taught me.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close