Universidad Rey Juan Carlos - URJC vs University of Aleppo vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI
Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Outstanding faculty and well-structured, specialized programs
- +Supportive community and opportunities for international experiences and internships
- +Well-managed university with accessible English-speaking staff
- +Prestigious institution with an elite faculty.
- +Welcoming to all nationalities.
- +Culture of innovation and modernity.
- +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
- +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
- -Lack of integration and support for international students is apparent.
- -Outdated facilities and rigid academic structures create dissatisfaction.
- -Limited resources hinder practical training.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Overall, this university garners respectable ratings across several key areas. Professors stand out with the highest score, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, location received the lowest rating, suggesting this may be an area for improvement. Student life and facilities are rated moderately well, alongside accommodation and internationality. Value for money also scores positively, contributing to a generally favorable perception.
This institution excels in its **location**, achieving a high score of 4.35. Conversely, its **accommodation** rating of 2.25 is notably the lowest. **Professors** and **value** also present strengths, scoring 3.6 and 3.35 respectively. Areas requiring improvement include **student life** (2.45) and **facilities** (2.65), with **internationality** falling in the mid-range at 2.75.
This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.
~74% of 111 reviews are positive, praising outstanding faculty, well-structured curriculum, and supportive community. Just ~4.5% of feedback is negative, with some students citing disappointment with campus comfort and staff English proficiency.
Reviews are split, with one positive and one negative, averaging 3.5/5 stars. Roughly 50% of feedback expresses challenges despite learning opportunities.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.
In my opnion is not a bad university but most of the teachers have many titles and certificates that say they are very good on the discipline they teach but they are not very good in the teaching skill. I can understand that some subjects could be boring but I think they can do better effort to encourage the students in their subjects. The approach to the teachers is not bad at all, the time for having an answer to an e-mail is 1 or 2 days (not involving weekends). The classes and most of the facilities (at least in Fuenlabrada) are new and comfortable both for teachers and students. The social aspect maybe is the worse of this university (and most of the Spanish ones I think), because the students come to class from many different places and after the classes most of the link between classmates breaks, so you can´ not do university lifestyle. The Double Degree in BMA+Law that I am doing the overall thinking is that it would be useful for the future so the hopes about the future are high.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
