Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Tampere University of Technology - TUT

Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK (4.90)
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 0/7 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/7 categories
Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK: wins 0/7 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 6/7 categories
Tampere University of Technology - TUT: wins 0/7 categories
University of Eastern Finland: wins 1/7 categories
Metropolia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
37 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
4.41
3.50
4.79
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Location
4.06
4.08
4.33
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.14
4.17
4.92
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Internationality
4.11
4.35
4.33
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.74
4.32
4.17
4.54
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.26
4.38
3.67
4.75
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.24
4.26
4.00
4.42
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive faculty and flexible personal study plans
  • +Welcoming international environment and diverse student body
  • +Well-structured programs with practical application and research opportunities
  • +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
  • +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
  • +Strong community support and active student life
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
  • +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
  • +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
  • +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths

Nothing to show

  • +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
  • +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
  • +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, particularly due to university reforms.
  • -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Insufficient academic support and resources.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university garners significant acclaim, particularly in **Student Life**, which stands out with a 4.74 rating. **Facilities** also score very highly at 4.63. Areas such as **Accomodation** (4.24), **Professors** (4.26), and **Value** (4.26) show solid performance. **Internationality** is rated at 4.11, and **Location** is the lowest scored category at 4.06, though still strong.

This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.

The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.

This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.43 average rating from 35 reviews, approximately 74% praise the inclusive environment, supportive teachers, and flexible study plans. A small portion (~3%) notes declining teaching quality due to university reformation.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.

Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.

All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.

Nothing to show

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
60%
57%
29%
88%
0%
67%
0%
4★
26%
38%
14%
12%
0%
33%
0%
3★
11%
11%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Great combinations of business and tech

I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.

Nothing to show

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close