Kenyatta University vs Karatina University - Karu vs Meru University of Science and Technology vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Bridge College

Side-by-side comparison from 263 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Kenyatta University: wins 0/7 categories
Karatina University - Karu: wins 1/7 categories
Meru University of Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 0/7 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/7 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 5/7 categories
Kenya Institute of Mass Communication - KIMC: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
228 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Agricultural Science
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Category ratings
Facilities
4.49
4.07
4.17
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Location
4.61
4.07
4.09
4.67
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Professors
4.36
4.47
Win
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.00
Internationality
4.21
4.00
3.33
3.67
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.00
Student life
4.26
4.21
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.00
Value
4.40
4.33
4.25
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
Accommodation
3.95
4.21
4.08
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +- Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
  • +- Well-structured and balanced curriculum
  • +- Opportunities for innovation and practical application
  • +Supportive community and friendly staff
  • +Engaging learning environment and dedicated professors
  • +Good facilities and affordable living
  • +Modern, practical learning facilities and equipment
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
  • +Emphasis on academic excellence and student well-being
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Practical skills development for career readiness
  • +Personal and talent growth opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and delays.
  • -Unfair and punitive grading systems compared to other institutions.
  • -Lack of specialization in some programs, leading to career uncertainty.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
  • -Limited course offerings and inflexible scheduling create barriers to learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong ratings across multiple facets, with Location being its standout strength at 4.55. Professors and Facilities also received high marks, scoring 4.36 and 4.41 respectively. Value and Student Life are similarly well-regarded. The area requiring the most improvement is Accomodation, which received the lowest score at 3.95. Internationality also sits in the mid-range.

This institution garners particularly high marks for its professors, reflecting a strong academic core. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback, indicating a supportive campus environment. While facilities and location are rated well, these areas represent the university's relative weakest points in the current assessment. Overall, the university demonstrates a commendable balance of strengths.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. The highest marks are for Value, closely followed by Facilities. Student Life and Accomodation also receive solid ratings. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, scoring considerably lower than other categories. The university's Location and Professors are rated well.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

This university garners excellent scores for its location, achieving a perfect 5. Its facilities and professors also stand out with strong 4-star ratings, complemented by a solid 4.5 for value. Areas for development include student life and accommodation, both scoring a respectable 3 to 3.5 stars. Internationality also received a positive 4-star rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 228 reviews, ~98% of feedback is positive. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers, well-structured courses, and supportive campus life. Minimal negative feedback noted issues with grading systems and project stage disorganization.

With ~87% positive feedback from 15 reviews, students highlight supportive staff, a conducive learning environment, and vibrant campus life. There is minimal negative feedback.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~92% rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, practical preparation, modern facilities, and approachable lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight strong practical skill development and opportunities to foster personal talents. No negative comments were received.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
40%
58%
67%
0%
67%
0%
4★
34%
47%
33%
33%
0%
33%
100%
3★
7%
13%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Life in KU

It was amazing, the professors were great. The school compound was extremely big and walking from one lecture hall to another was a big challenge. The long ques during meals at the mess was crazy. There is this thing called missing marks, you could visit exam office a million times without help.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close