Fundación Universitaria de Popayán - FUP vs Universidad del Cauca - UNICAUCA vs Universidad Tecnológica del Centro - UNITEC vs Eastern Washington University-EWU vs CodeOp

Side-by-side comparison from 21 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Eastern Washington University-EWU (5.00)
Fundación Universitaria de Popayán - FUP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad del Cauca - UNICAUCA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Tecnológica del Centro - UNITEC: wins 0/6 categories
Eastern Washington University-EWU: wins 1/6 categories
CodeOp: wins 4/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Institute of Management and Technology - IMT : wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Cheney, Washington, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Visual Communication Design
Barcelona, Spain
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.17
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.83
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.42
Not rated
4.33
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.92
Win
Not rated
3.83
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.33
Win
Not rated
4.17
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.25
Not rated
4.50
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Quality education and social responsibility
  • +Significant growth and qualified personnel
  • +City location and multiple venues

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-experienced instructors
  • +Convenient campus location
  • +Welcoming and safe community
  • +Excellent instructors and support
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Strong focus on engineering and technology
  • +Up-to-date teaching and challenging practicals
  • +Qualified and patient lecturers
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Unresponsive or inefficient administrative and management processes.
  • -Lack of clear communication regarding academic expectations and policies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring complaint.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause significant frustration.
  • -The curriculum feels outdated and lacks practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of clear communication.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a rating of 0 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates no areas of strength or weakness, as all aspects were rated identically. The consistent zero score suggests a need for significant development across the entire university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With exceptional scores in key areas, the institution excels in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, rated 4. While internationality also scores a strong 4, student life emerges as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3. Overall value is considered good at 4.

This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths in **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and strong performances in **Value** (4.5) and **Accomodation** and **Professors** (both 4.33). Facilities and Student Life also score well at 4.17. The area requiring the most attention appears to be **Internationality**, with a rating of 3.83.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, this university is praised for its significant growth and quality education. Students highlight its responsible approach to social matters.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received one positive review. The reviewer highlighted accessible Visual Communication Design program classes and instructors with real industry experience. No negative feedback was provided.

University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students commend the institution's technology focus, excellent engineering and technology performance, updated teaching, and challenging practicals.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
33%
4★
100%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
33%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
17%
0%
33%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close