Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs Universidad de Cartagena - UNICARTAGENA vs Illinois Institute of Technology vs Florida State University - FSU vs Vishwa Adarsha College

Side-by-side comparison from 512 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de Cartagena - UNICARTAGENA: wins 0/6 categories
Illinois Institute of Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Florida State University - FSU: wins 1/6 categories
Vishwa Adarsha College: wins 2/6 categories
Pondicherry University: wins 1/6 categories
Bunker Hill Community College: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Management and Law
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Tallahassee, Florida, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
432 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Pondicherry, India
4.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.30
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.36
4.00
4.25
Not rated
Location
4.43
Not rated
4.67
4.52
5.00
Win
4.75
Not rated
Professors
4.22
Not rated
5.00
4.66
5.00
4.25
Not rated
Internationality
4.05
Not rated
4.00
4.24
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.23
Not rated
4.33
4.21
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.03
Not rated
4.33
4.41
5.00
Win
3.25
Not rated
Accommodation
4.11
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.10
3.00
3.75
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable professors and mentors
  • +Beautiful and inspiring campus with nature
  • +Welcoming, diverse, and vibrant student community
  • +High-quality faculty and demanding admission process
  • +Strong academic environment and knowledgeable student body
  • +Good professor staff and continuous faculty development
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative and diverse learning environment
  • +Supportive faculty and academic staff
  • +Hands-on and practical learning opportunities
  • +Small class sizes and personalized attention
  • +Encouragement of academic and extracurricular engagement.
  • +Friendly teachers and a supportive environment.
  • +Good facilities and a homely atmosphere.
  • +Freedom and individual growth opportunities
  • +Strong academics, knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Modern and well-maintained campus facilities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt program quality.
  • -Program curriculum lacks relevance and depth.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication from management.
  • -Outdated technology and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Lack of student support services and unresponsive faculty.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -The curriculum and teaching quality are frequently criticized for being unengaging or inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings, with Location emerging as the strongest area at 4.43. Facilities also scored highly at 4.30. Student life and professors received solid marks around 4.2. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are Internationality and Value, both hovering just above 4.0. Accommodations also scored moderately at 4.11.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received zero ratings. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses to highlight. The university presents a uniformly low performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

This institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in the **Professors** category with a perfect score. **Facilities** and **Location** also stand out with high marks. **Student Life** and **Value** are rated favorably, while **Accomodation** and **Internationality** show solid but less exceptional performance, representing the areas with the lowest scores.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets, with professors receiving the highest marks. Location and value are also notable strengths. Among the areas with slightly lower ratings, accommodation and student life present opportunities for improvement. Facilities, while still well-regarded, also sit towards the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics.

This institution garners strong marks for its professors, location, and overall value, all receiving top scores. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring a 3 out of 5. Internationality also received a solid rating.

This institution garners excellent marks for its vibrant student life, scoring a perfect 5. Location is another significant strength, with a 4.75 rating. Areas for potential improvement include value, rated at 3.25, and accommodation, which received a 3.75. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a solid 4 to 4.25 range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising world-class professors, an amazing campus with nature, and a vibrant student life. Very few reviews mention specific program coordination issues or a lack of perceived faculty effort in niche areas.

This university is highly praised, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high academic standards. One minor suggestion mentions improving installations due to potential resource delays.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the rigorous curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and research opportunities. A minor concern was the limited scholarship availability for international students and a lack of cultural diversity among Master's students.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~99.3%) with an average rating of 4.34/5. Students praise supportive faculty, hands-on learning, and academic rigor. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised. Students highlight friendly teachers, a focus on both academics and extracurriculars, and a homely environment with good facilities.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students highlight excellent educational experiences, individual growth opportunities, and supportive faculty. Well-maintained facilities and engaging coursework are frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
27%
100%
33%
35%
100%
75%
0%
4★
56%
0%
67%
64%
0%
25%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My opinion about Adam Mickiewicz University

In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good student support

As I pursue my education, my university supports me well and communicates with me frequently. The level of communication is outstanding, we are given access to the university's resources at the beginning of the semester and are exposed to much more.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close