University of Vigo vs ITCA Fepade vs St. John's University vs Saint Louis University - SLU vs Higher School of Economics and Business - ESEN
Side-by-side comparison from 101 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and strong academic programs
- +Welcoming and diverse student environment
- +High employability and available student support services
- +Engaging and innovative teaching methods
- +Feeling productive and proactive during studies
- +Supportive supervisors and accessible postgraduate programs
- +Abundant student organizations and walkable campus
- +Helpful staff and faculty for student issues
- +Practical and versatile skill development for future careers.
- +Readiness for diverse work environments and job types.
- +Excellent professors and strong academic programs.
- +Supportive student community and emphasis on practical application.
- +Rigorous environment fostering professional development and leadership skills.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear course structures.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities require urgent repairs.
- -Poor transportation links and distance from the city.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a concern.
- -Teaching quality and course relevance are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Limited career support and job prospects disappoint.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of course relevance frustrate students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the standout area. The university also received strong marks for its **Professors** and **Accommodation**. Areas that performed less strongly include **Location** and **Facilities**. **Internationality** and **Value** received good, though not exceptional, scores.
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly satisfactory experience in these domains. The weakest area identified is location, which received a moderate rating of 3, suggesting it may be a less defining strength compared to the other overwhelmingly positive aspects.
The university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across multiple aspects. Its location and internationality are particularly well-regarded, achieving the highest ratings. Professors and value also receive excellent scores. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still good, is rated lower than other categories. Student life and facilities are also solid, indicating a well-rounded experience.
This institution excels with perfect scores for its professors, location, and student life. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, receiving solid four-star ratings. The university's internationality is its weakest area, scoring three stars, indicating room for growth in global engagement. Overall, it presents a strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality and campus environment.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in **Value**, receiving a rating of 4.82, and **Facilities**, scoring 4.7. Student life and accommodation also rank highly at 4.64 and 4.67 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, with a rating of 4.18, though all other aspects of the student experience are positively reviewed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good careers, excellent professors, and a welcoming student environment. A small percentage of negative feedback exists, with one mention of outdated evaluation regulations and another of faculty issues.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, around 100%. Students appreciate modern teaching methods, finding them productive and engaging. There are no reported negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with a 4.25 average rating. Students highlight competitive programs, helpful supervisors, affordable postgraduate options, and engaging campus life with many organizations. A small amount of feedback noted recent tuition increases and changes post-pandemic.
This university has a strong positive reputation, with ~100% of feedback being positive. Students feel well-prepared for their careers, though some wish more licensure exam topics were covered.
All 11 reviews are positive (100%), with students praising academic excellence, professors' passion and patience, and strong student camaraderie. The challenging environment fosters professional development and leadership skills.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
They taught me to be ready for any type of work as a civil engineer. They made sure that we are capable of working in any type of environment and that we can do any type of job. The only downside was they didn't tackle topics for the licensure examinations. It was hard to remember the whole 5 years in just 5 months of review.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
