Université de Toulouse vs Ibn Zohr University vs The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - PolyU vs EMAA Business School vs Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS (5.00)
Université de Toulouse: wins 0/7 categories
Ibn Zohr University: wins 0/7 categories
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - PolyU: wins 1/7 categories
EMAA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Institut Supérieur des Professions Infirmières et des Techniques de Santé Agadir - ISPITS: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Accounting
Agadir, Morocco
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Assistance and Philosophy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.14
4.45
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.27
3.57
4.91
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.27
3.57
4.36
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.09
2.86
4.27
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
2.43
4.45
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.18
3.71
4.55
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.18
2.86
4.36
Win
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated, accomplished faculty and rigorous academic programs
  • +Modern facilities and a vibrant, inclusive campus life
  • +Holistic, forward-thinking educational experience
  • +Helpful and supportive professors
  • +Practical and understandable programs
  • +Value for money
  • +World-class programs and practical learning
  • +Extensive internship and career opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus life and convenient location

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, skill-building experience and qualified instructors
  • +Well-structured program balancing theory and practice
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of funds and transparency, negatively impact student experience and facilities.
  • -Outdated curriculum and insufficient resources hinder teachers from providing optimal education.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant concern.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners strong ratings across multiple facets. It particularly excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of approximately 4.27. **Accomodation** and **Value** also perform well, averaging around 4.18. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated at a solid 4, indicating good, though not exceptional, performance in these areas.

Overall, the university presents a varied rating profile. The strongest areas are **Value** (3.71), **Professors** (3.57), and **Location** (3.57), indicating positive perceptions in these aspects. Conversely, **Student Life** (2.43) emerges as the weakest area. **Facilities** (3.14) and **Accommodation** (2.86) also fall in the mid-range, with **Internationality** (2.86) performing similarly to accommodation.

This institution garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Location** with a score of 4.91. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received strong ratings at 4.45. Areas rated slightly lower include **Professors** and **Accomodation** at 4.36, and **Internationality** at 4.27. The university demonstrates a good overall value, scoring 4.55.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves near-perfect scores across most surveyed areas, excelling in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The sole area showing a slight dip, though still strong, is Accomodation, rated at a commendable 4. Overall, the university presents a robust and highly-rated educational experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise exceptional faculty, comprehensive programs, modern facilities, and vibrant campus life, contributing to a holistic and supportive educational experience.

Approximately 43% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills and approachable professors. While ~14% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with resources and facilities, the average rating is 3.43/5.

With ~83% positive feedback and an average of 4.5/5, reviews highlight strong academic quality, professional advantages, and diverse campus life with ample opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This reflects ~100% positive feedback, highlighting a well-structured program, qualified instructors, and beneficial clinical placements.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
14%
67%
0%
100%
4★
100%
29%
17%
0%
0%
3★
0%
43%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My studies at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University

I SKIP CLASSES! I'm currently enrolled at the hong kong polytechnic university.... That is how my review should start rationally, right? But, here is a thing - I'm enrolled in the university and the last time I have been to lectures was half a year ago! It is supposed to be my 2nd year now, but due to the protests, coronavirus I'm on the online teaching for half a year!!!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close