St. Paul's University - SPU vs The Catholic University of Eastern Africa vs Management University of Africa vs Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC vs Riara University - RIARA

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC (5.00)
St. Paul's University - SPU: wins 0/5 categories
The Catholic University of Eastern Africa: wins 0/5 categories
Management University of Africa: wins 0/5 categories
Kenya Technical Trainers College - KTTC: wins 5/5 categories
Riara University - RIARA: wins 0/5 categories
University of Rwanda - UR: wins 0/5 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration and Operations Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Development Studies
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.63
3.95
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.83
3.75
Location
4.60
4.71
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.50
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.14
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
4.33
4.00
Internationality
4.27
4.19
3.67
5.00
Win
4.00
3.33
3.00
Student life
4.71
4.05
3.33
5.00
Win
4.50
3.50
2.75
Value
4.73
4.48
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
4.67
4.25
Accommodation
4.58
3.67
3.33
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Peaceful, positive learning environment and personal growth focus
  • +Quality education and strong academic performance leading to career success
  • +Supportive learning environment and approachable faculty
  • +High academic quality and relevant course material
  • +Beautiful campus and Christian-based values
  • +Engaging faculty and supportive staff
  • +Opportunities for strong student-staff and peer interaction
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable professors
  • +Extensive student support and resources
  • +Engaging learning environment
  • +Enriching curriculum and hands-on projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Flexible learning options (hybrid/online)
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Strong academic foundation with practical application opportunities
  • +Diverse, welcoming campus community and good infrastructure
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Ineffective teaching and outdated curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates excellent performance in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.71. Value for money and facilities also scored very well, at 4.73 and 4.63 respectively. Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest score, at 4.27, suggesting room for growth in this aspect. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with a particularly vibrant student experience.

Evaluations reveal a strong showing for this institution, particularly in location, which received the highest score. Internationality and value also scored highly, indicating positive perceptions in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presented the weakest rating among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and student life received solid scores, falling comfortably within the upper range of the assessments. Professors were also rated favorably, reflecting a competent academic staff.

This institution receives high marks for its outstanding location, earning a perfect score. Professors and overall value are also strong points, both rated at 4.33. Facilities are well-regarded at 4. Student life and accommodation, however, are areas for potential improvement, scoring 3.33. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.67.

With perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received top marks. There are no weak areas identified, indicating a consistently outstanding university experience and offering.

This institution showcases impressive strengths, particularly in its **Facilities**, earning a perfect score. **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** also stand out with highly positive ratings. The university's **Location** and **Internationality** are well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category presents the most significant area for potential improvement, receiving the lowest score among the surveyed aspects.

This institution garners high marks for its excellent **Location** (4.5) and outstanding **Value** (4.67). **Professors** also receive strong recognition (4.33). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Student Life** (3.5) represent areas with lower ratings, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** are rated a solid 4, while **Facilities** score 3.83.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.54/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback across 26 reviews, students praise St. Paul's University's supportive lecturers, practical courses, and peaceful learning environment, fostering personal and professional growth.

With a ~81% positive sentiment, students praise the supportive environment, knowledgeable faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Minimal negative feedback (~4.8%) noted issues with communication and infrastructure.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic learning environment and supportive faculty interactions. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight knowledgeable professors and a rich array of resources for success, including excellent library, labs, and strong support services.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 stars, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students found the program enriching and the faculty supportive, appreciating hands-on projects and flexible learning options like hybrid and online classes.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, a strong academic foundation, and a diverse community. Some mention slow administrative processes.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
52%
33%
100%
50%
50%
25%
4★
46%
29%
33%
0%
50%
33%
50%
3★
0%
14%
33%
0%
0%
17%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Worst University Ever !!

As a first-year Bachelor of Science (Computer Science) student, I can confidently say this university is a complete disappointment. The lack of communication between lecturers and students is shocking—emails go unanswered, and there’s no support when issues arise. The infrastructure is falling apart—old, broken chairs that look like they belong in a primary school, dusty classrooms, and ancient computers that barely function (some seem to be from the early 2000s!). How are we supposed to learn modern computer science on relics? The online unit registration is a nightmare—it’s glitchy, unreliable, and has caused me to lose crucial units. Shockingly, even the fundamental computer science unit (the core of the degree!) was missing from allocations. The administration does nothing to fix these issues. Lecturers are unreliable—showing up late or not at all, with no makeup classes. The systems are always slow, and there are zero extracurricular activities, making campus life dull and isolating. Save your time and money—this place is a scam. If you actually care about your education, look elsewhere.

University and Friendships

The college experience for me was the greatest platform to create friendships with not only fellow student but with professors too. The university staff was intentional in interacting with students, in class and outside class. The university organized events that made these interactions possible and easy. This was one of the best things in my campus life

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close