EU Business School vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universidad de Navarra - UNAV
Side-by-side comparison from 481 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Experienced and supportive professors with real-world insights.
- +Diverse and international environment fostering strong networks.
- +Practical and engaging learning with opportunities for business ventures.
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +High-quality, approachable teaching staff
- +Diverse opportunities and enriching programs
- +Welcoming student community and beautiful environment
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Engaging instructors and effective teaching methods
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Relevant and practical curriculum leading to career success
- -Administrative and management issues, including disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -Poor quality of education and inadequate study facilities like libraries and study halls.
- -Lack of accreditation and limited post-graduation opportunities for students.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are consistently mentioned.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff are significant frustrations.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individualized attention are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues plague scheduling and student group allocation.
- -Outdated computer programs hinder practical skill development.
- -Overly theoretical coursework fails to align with current labor market needs.
This university exhibits strong performance, particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring highly. **Student Life** also received a favorable rating. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which scored notably lower than other categories. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** received moderately positive ratings, indicating areas of moderate satisfaction.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
This university demonstrates a strong profile, excelling particularly in the quality of its professors, with a rating of 4.19. Student life and accommodation also received high marks at 4.16. Conversely, the university's value for money is its lowest-rated aspect, scoring 3.85. Facilities and internationality are also solid, though not as prominent as the top-performing areas.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
A well-rounded assessment reveals this institution excels in its **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving top marks. Conversely, it faces challenges with **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both rated at a lower two. **Professors** also received a modest rating of two. The **Value** proposition sits comfortably in the upper half of the scale, suggesting a generally positive, though not flawless, university experience.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong networking, experienced professors, and an international environment. A small percentage of negative feedback (about 7.8%) notes disorganization and basic education.
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4.62/5 from 104 reviews, ~97% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback frequently praises approachable and expert professors, enriching programs with international opportunities, and a welcoming campus environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With 3 reviews and an average rating of 2.67/5, feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing disorganization in administration, scheduling, and outdated course content. No positive reviews were provided.
Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
Alguna vez me contaron la historia del hijo de una familia real de un pais europeo importante. El chico estaba buscando una universidad; ya había pasado por Cambridge, Oxford y algunas universidades de Estados Unidos. Decidió visitar la Universidad de Navarra junto con su padre y les gustó mucho. En medio de la cena con el rector, el padre le dice al recto: ¿sabes que me ha gustado más de la Universidad? La mirada de los alumnos... en ellos se nota que son personas felices, alegres, generosas... El chico se acabó quedando en la Universidad de Navarra pudiendo estudiar en cualquier otra universidad del mundo. Eso es lo que más me gusta de la Universidad -además del buen nivel académico-, que es propiamente universal; un lugar donde se interesan por ti, no solo desde el punto de vista académico sino personal. Se busca realmente formar personas y se les invita a vivir una experiencia universitaria autentica.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Nothing to show
