Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs University of Hawaii at Manoa vs Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute - GIKI vs Tashkent State Technical University

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute - GIKI (4.40)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso - UFMT: wins 0/6 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 1/6 categories
University of Hawaii at Manoa: wins 0/6 categories
Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute - GIKI: wins 2/6 categories
Tashkent State Technical University: wins 0/6 categories
Ecole Rockefeller: wins 3/6 categories
Women University Swabi - Wus: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Administration
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
3.80
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Paramedical
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.20
3.50
4.29
Win
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.60
3.80
4.50
3.75
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.60
4.17
4.17
4.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.40
3.00
4.17
3.38
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
3.80
4.20
4.00
4.75
Win
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.20
4.50
Win
3.67
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.20
3.00
3.33
4.63
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified and supportive faculty
  • +Excellent infrastructure and resources, including a well-equipped hospital
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs with career-boosting opportunities
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +Passionate, knowledgeable, and caring professors
  • +Supportive learning environment and academic growth
  • +Beautiful campus and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Academic rigor and challenging environment
  • +Beautiful campus with active student life and personal development focus
  • +Supportive faculty and good career prospects

Nothing to show

  • +Highly regarded paramedical programs and attentive, supportive staff.
  • +Engaging courses and valuable internship opportunities.
  • +Encouraging environment fostering student confidence.

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor infrastructure and lack of research support.
  • -Unclear career path guidance.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources frustrate students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unsupportive management create significant problems.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not well-aligned with real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Academics and campus experience are key strengths, with **Professors** and **Location** both scoring an excellent 4.6. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received solid ratings of 4 and 4.2 respectively. The university's **Internationality** stands out as its weakest area, receiving a 3.4, while **Student Life** is rated moderately at 3.8. Overall, the university offers good **Value** at 4.2.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This university presents a strong profile, notably excelling in its **location (4.5)** and boasting excellent **professors (4.17)** and **internationality (4.17)**. Student life also scores well at 4.0. Conversely, its **accommodation (3.33)** and **facilities (3.5)** represent the weakest areas, while value for money is rated moderately at 3.67.

This institution performs exceptionally well in Student Life and Accommodations, both receiving scores over 4.6. Facilities also score highly at 4.28. The weakest area is Internationality, rated at 3.375, with Location not far behind at 3.75. Value and Professors are rated a solid 4.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly in its professors, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect five. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded, with four-star ratings. The university demonstrates strong internationality, also earning a five. Its weakest area, though still positive, is its value for money, which is rated at four stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are largely positive (~83%), praising exceptional faculty, good campus infrastructure, and career-boosting programs. A small percentage of feedback (~17%) notes issues with research environment and career paths.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

With ~83% positive feedback, students highlight knowledgeable and caring professors, a welcoming learning atmosphere, and rewarding academic growth. Some note the tuition is pricey.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students highlight a beautiful campus with active societies, academic rigor, and personal growth opportunities. Some note the tough exams and strict policies.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, this university is positively perceived. The single review highlighted fame in the paramedical field, engaging teachers and courses, and supportive staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
83%
43%
0%
38%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
29%
83%
63%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
29%
17%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Should Chose a Better Program

Communication is a bridge between theory and hands-on work. Although it’s more theory… If you’re looking for something in media, design, or marketing I suggest you pass on Comms. It’s a jack of all trades but a master of nothing type of degree or program at least. The companies are looking for a niche, experienced workers, so you’re better off doing PR, graphic design, or videography. Learning a lot of theory and book knowledge is good if you want to go the academic route, but even within academia it’s super competitive and my college at least didn’t have as much opportunity or resources as other fields of study like the sciences etc. The degree helped a little bit, but most of the professional experience that has opened doors for me was self-learned online with free resources.

GIKI Pakistan Overall Review

1. Great Campus Life, highly recommended for grooming and exposure. 2. Amazing campus, surrounding in natural mountains and very aesthetic Infrastructure. 3. Education is very good but really tough cause of some policies. 4. A bit expensive than usual universities. 5. Some student policies for students are very strict and can cause a bit trouble for completion of degree. 6. Alumni Network is very extensive and helpful.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close