University of Toronto - UofT vs University of British Columbia vs McMaster University vs ABC Business Academy vs Douglas College New Westminster
Side-by-side comparison from 589 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and career-focused opportunities
- +Welcoming campus community and extensive networking
- +Prestigious reputation and global perspective
- +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
- +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment
- +Supportive and passionate professors
- +Welcoming and diverse community with many involvement opportunities
- +Excellent resources for career planning and development
Nothing to show
- +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
- +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
- +Abundant student resources for academic success
- +Diverse student body and extracurricular involvement opportunities
- +Practical experience through student union and marketing department work
- +Research-focused graduate programs and academic excellence
- +Supportive community and engaging, thought-provoking academic experiences
- +Helpful professors and practical knowledge gained
- -Administrative and management issues lead to understaffed services and long wait times.
- -Outdated facilities and overpriced amenities detract from the student experience.
- -An overemphasis on research, coupled with a lack of practical learning and career support, is disappointing.
- -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
- -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of clarity and support in coursework and academic guidance.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of essential resources and poor support services are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
This university garners high marks, particularly excelling in Internationality (4.42) and Location (4.38). Value (4.24) and Facilities (4.19) also received strong scores. The areas with the lowest ratings, though still respectable, are Student Life (3.79) and Accomodation (3.83). Professors (4.15) are rated favorably, contributing to an overall positive assessment.
Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.
With exceptional ratings in several categories, this university shines particularly brightly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.48. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received strong marks at 4.22. **Value** is another notable strength, with a rating of 4.39. The **Accomodation** area received the lowest, though still positive, rating of 4.10. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with a clear international focus.
Nothing to show
A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.
Exceptional scores highlight key strengths in facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors and location also perform well, earning solid 4s. The university's weakest area, however, is accommodation, receiving a significantly lower rating of 1.
An assessment of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive profile. The strongest areas are clearly **Value** (4.71), **Location** (4.43), and **Internationality** (4.43), indicating excellent offerings in these aspects. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** present the weakest points, both receiving scores of 3.29. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within a solid middle range.
With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~98.3% of reviews are positive, praising academic programs, networking, and campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback notes concerns with student services and teaching quality.
Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.
With 83 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting supportive and knowledgeable professors, a vibrant and diverse community with many clubs, and a welcoming campus. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.
With one review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The sole feedback highlighted positive interactions with diverse personalities, contributing to skill development, and engagement with the Student Union. No negative feedback was received.
Students generally have a very positive experience, with ~86% of feedback being highly favorable. The average rating is 4.14/5, highlighting strong academic programs and supportive communities. Limited resources were a minor concern.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show