Murang'a University of Technology - mut vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Sigma Academy vs Africa Nazarene University vs Kabete National Polytechnic

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Murang'a University of Technology - mut: wins 1/6 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 1/6 categories
Sigma Academy: wins 0/6 categories
Africa Nazarene University: wins 4/6 categories
Kabete National Polytechnic: wins 0/6 categories
University of Rwanda - UR: wins 0/6 categories
Kenya Medical Training College: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Education Arts
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Environmental Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.33
3.83
3.75
Location
4.10
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.33
4.50
4.00
Professors
4.50
Win
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.00
4.33
4.00
Internationality
4.30
3.67
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.33
3.33
3.00
Student life
4.40
4.33
Not rated
4.67
Win
3.33
3.50
2.75
Value
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.67
3.67
4.67
4.25
Accommodation
4.44
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
2.33
4.00
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated, supportive lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Technological advancements and innovation
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse programs, mission-driven academics, and faculty expertise.
  • +Ethical development and Christian values integration.
  • +Culturally rich environment and international exposure.
  • +Skilled and professional teachers
  • +Good learning environment and practical education
  • +Strong infrastructure
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Strong academic foundation with practical application opportunities
  • +Diverse, welcoming campus community and good infrastructure
  • +Dedicated and committed lecturers
  • +Clear learning objectives and practical skill development
  • +Slow administrative processes
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication with staff and instructors is frequently poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent complaints.
  • -The quality of instruction and faculty engagement is often subpar.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives strong marks across the board, with particularly high scores for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.5. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Internationality is rated at 4.3, while the Location stands out as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.1. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with excellent academic and student experience components.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas, notably in facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Professors also earned a strong rating of 4.33. Location is the sole category with a slightly lower score, receiving a 4.

Offering a well-rounded student experience, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, receiving a strong rating of 4.33. Professors are also highly regarded at 4. In contrast, **Accommodation** is a notable area for improvement, scoring a 2.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range. Value is rated at a respectable 3.67.

This institution garners high marks for its excellent **Location** (4.5) and outstanding **Value** (4.67). **Professors** also receive strong recognition (4.33). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Student Life** (3.5) represent areas with lower ratings, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** are rated a solid 4, while **Facilities** score 3.83.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas, with **Value** and **Location** receiving the highest scores at 4.25 and 4 respectively. Professors are also well-regarded, averaging a 4. While facilities and internationality are rated moderately, student life and accommodation represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 2.75 and 2.25, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students consistently praise Murang'a University of Technology for its dedicated and supportive lecturers who facilitate timely syllabus completion. They also highlight the clean, safe, and vibrant campus environment with strong technological investment, contributing to quality education.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews highlight strong program diversity, mission-driven academics, and a vibrant campus with international exposure. Students also appreciate the ethical and moral development offered, though one mentions the university is expensive.

Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting a good learning environment and skilled teachers. One review, however, noted a lack of chairs and exam department issues.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, a strong academic foundation, and a diverse community. Some mention slow administrative processes.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise opportunities for growth, skill development, and committed lecturers. Some noted slow registration processes and poor food quality, with limited options.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
67%
0%
67%
33%
50%
25%
4★
40%
33%
0%
33%
33%
33%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
25%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close