University College Cork - UCC vs Cork Institute of Technology - CIT vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Cork University Business School - CUBS
Side-by-side comparison from 103 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality programs and academic excellence
- +Supportive faculty and enriching research opportunities
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world application
- +Approachable lecturers with industry experience and personalized feedback
- +Engaging, relevant courses and positive campus environment
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
- +International environment and global opportunities
- +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
Nothing to show
- +Supportive guidance throughout the student journey
- +Practical, skill-focused education with industry-experienced professors
- +Affordable programs and welcoming community atmosphere
- +Practical, hands-on learning and preparation for the real world
- +Knowledgeable, helpful, and supportive lecturers
- +Strong academic standards and emphasis on business/communication skills
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of support.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unsupportive and unengaging teaching negatively impacts the experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
- -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of essential university facilities and student support services
- -Poor teaching quality and insufficient practical application
- -Inadequate building maintenance and uncomfortable conditions
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Overall, this institution receives favorable reviews, with its strongest areas being **Value** and **Student Life**, both exceeding 4.1. **Location** also scores well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, which falls below 3.5. Other categories, including **Professors**, **Internationality**, and **Facilities**, generally fall within the mid-to-high 3s and low 4s.
This university shows a strong profile with excellent scores in Facilities (4.6) and Location (4.5). Student Life and Internationality also received positive marks. However, Accommodation emerges as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.6, with Value also rating slightly lower than other aspects. Professors' ratings are commendable, reflecting a good academic standing.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly praised, with Professors and Internationality both receiving a strong 4.29 rating. Location also scores well at 4.17. The university's weakest area is Accomodation, which received a lower score of 2.88. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
Overall, this institution receives commendations for its robust student life, scoring a notable 4.4. Professors are also highly regarded, with an average rating of 4.33. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, rated at 3.33. Facilities and internationality both received a score of 3.67, indicating moderate performance in these areas.
Nearly all (approximately 100%) of the 51 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.12/5. Students highlight academic excellence, strong research, and faculty expertise. No negative reviews were recorded.
Students highly praise professors' practical knowledge and personalized attention, fostering engaging class discussions and tailored feedback. Excellent courses, facilities, societies, and a helpful student union are frequently mentioned positive aspects. No negative feedback was received.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive guidance, practical learning, and friendly staff. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions a lack of facilities and career support.
University reviews are largely positive (~83%), highlighting practical courses, knowledgeable lecturers, and good facilities. Some students mentioned a desire for improved classroom facilities and support for international students.
My time as a student at University College Cork (UCC) has been truly transformative. UCC's unwavering commitment to academic brilliance, alongside its lively campus life, has made my experience here unforgettable.
Having attended Cork Institute of Technology for the past four years, I have found it to be an excellent college in terms of student/lecturer interaction and engagement. Unlike most universities, where students can simply be a number in the system, the name of each student will be known by each of their lecturers at CIT. If you have a question during a lecturer, CIT's class sizes means that a student can simply raise their hand and have the issue addressed there and then, there is no need for the student to have to wait for a tutorial, etc. to get a question answered. Each lecturer will do his or her best to make sure that each student achieves their full potential and most will go above or beyond the call of duty in ensuring that students reach the next stage of the programme. I don't think that you will find a college in Ireland in which a better student/lecturer working relationship exists, CIT genuinely cares about its students. However, like most Institutes of Technology in Ireland, CIT is severely under-funded and now has more students attending the college than ever. Simple amenities such as canteen facilities and parking can be an issue at certain peak times during the semester. Other areas in the college also need a massive revamp in order to bring them in line with modern standards.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
