Ecole Nationale des Sciences Appliquées de Kenitra - ENSAK vs Vilnius University vs Polytechnic of Torino - Polito vs University of Huddersfield vs Ibn Tofail University - UIT
Side-by-side comparison from 273 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse engineering majors and foundational learning
- +Abundant extracurricular opportunities
- +Excellent learning system and accessible study materials
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty and coordinators
- +Strong academic programs with practical training opportunities
- +Student-friendly city with affordable living and job opportunities
- +High-quality education with hands-on experience and in-demand graduates
- +Numerous extracurricular activities and scholarship options
- +Knowledgeable, friendly, and supportive tutors
- +Excellent facilities and industry-level equipment
- +Strong student support and campus amenities
- +Academic growth and skill development
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Committed and helpful faculty
- +Strong technical programmes and practical learning opportunities
- +Dedicated, qualified, and supportive lecturers
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant campus environment
- +Supportive faculty and approachable staff
- +Focus on career development and working opportunities
- +Welcoming campus environment and positive community
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of clear communication and support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and guidance from faculty is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is often irrelevant and outdated.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of individual attention.
- -Poorly maintained facilities and outdated equipment.
- -Ineffective and unsupportive administrative and management.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a disconnect from student needs are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
- -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is prevalent.
This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, no specific areas stand out as strengths or weaknesses, as all aspects of the university appear to be rated equally low.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Value** (4.60) and **Professors** (4.58). Student life, location, and internationality also score highly. However, **Accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with room for improvement in its housing provisions.
This institution scores exceptionally well in its location, earning a top rating of 4.37. Value for money also stands out at 4.29. Conversely, accommodation represents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.66. Student life, while solid, is also among the lower-scoring aspects at 3.80. Other areas like facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a strong mid-range.
This university receives consistently positive ratings, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.28. **Professors** (4.26) and **Facilities** (4.26) also perform very strongly. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded at 4.18. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include **Student Life** (3.96) and **Accomodation** (3.96).
Evaluations indicate a strong academic environment with high scores for Professors (4.36) and Facilities (4.29). Value for money also scores well at 4.14. Areas for improvement include Accomodation (3.54) and Internationality (3.43), which received the lowest ratings. Student Life (3.79) and Location (4.00) fall in the mid-range.
Across various metrics, this institution receives commendations, particularly for its exceptional professors and prime location, both scoring highly. Student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, indicated by lower ratings. Facilities also present a moderately good but not outstanding aspect. Accommodation and value for money are rated quite favorably, suggesting a positive overall experience in these regards.
With stellar scores in Professors, Student Life, Accommodations, and Internationality, the university excels in providing a supportive and engaging environment. Facilities and Location also received strong ratings. The sole area not reaching the highest tier was Facilities, though it still earned a commendable four out of five.
The single review rates the university 5/5, indicating a highly positive sentiment (~100%). The feedback highlights a variety of engineering majors and extracurriculars.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~93% of students rating it 4–5 stars. Praised aspects include learning systems, humble and helpful teachers, and an international environment. Minimal negative feedback exists.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84%), highlighting a good student experience, numerous activities, and future opportunities. Students also appreciate the university's location and perceived value, with no negative feedback recorded.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 60 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~93%). Students highlight knowledgeable tutors, good course support, and helpful university staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.07/5, ~79% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic growth, supportive environments, and committed lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.
The university is highly praised for its academic excellence, practical learning opportunities, and career preparation. All feedback is positive, reflecting strong satisfaction with quality instruction and facilities.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5 stars, indicating very positive feedback. The single review praises the supportive faculty, career development focus, and welcoming campus environment. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
For me, Vilnius University is well known & best University in whole Europe. Many international students are studying here.They are really making friendly rules for EU students though which is not applicable for Non EU students.There are lot of students from Asia & Africa continent's.As we know meximum things are different in these continent's, so they are facing huge problems after coming here for every case. In abroad, I think University's are like a family for us, so they should make some rules for us, which can release our academic & mental pressure, such as academic leave for a semester or a year.Now we can take the academic leave though I don’t think It’s the perfect way for non Eu students. So I am requesting that Universities should consider these matters for Non Eu students. Without these I love my University.
Polito has several campus across the city. Each of them is in a convinient location and close to the bus, trum and metro. Going to the campus is easy because of the location and the transportation system.
I just started Semester 2 at University of Huddersfield and I’m a student currently studying Applied Psychology on a 4 year course. I think most of the lecturers here are really kind and explain concepts very well. The pacing of assignments or tests is also good as there’s always plenty of time to meet deadlines. The student support team is also really great, as well as other amenities that are available on campus to support the students. We are also assigned a personal tutor with whom we can communicate about any issues. Overall, my experience so far at the University is basically perfect, lots of opportunities to meet new people as well which is fun.
Nothing to show
My experience a NUST was a time to remember. I was in the engineering department. Lecturers were always on time for lecturers, and work and assignments were given and marked. I am the engineer I am owing to the dedication by the chemical engineering lecturers. Quality notes and lecturers are given as well as projects supervision and guidance. Even years after I have graduated, they are still available to give letters of recommendation as per request. My degree is recognized everywhere l have been and l recently got accredited as a professional engineer with ECSA based on my experience and academic background. Campus life as an engineering student is quite dull to be honest, best indulge in sports. During my time I took part in Basketball and athletics. They had transport from campus to the practice courts as the university didn't have an onsite basketball court. As for the ZUSA games where we meet with other universities to compete, I give that 1 star as we had to sleep in the bus over a two-day trip. I don't know if that has improved as resources were truly limited
Nothing to show
