SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs William Paterson University - WP vs Schiller International University vs Southern New Hampshire University - SNHU
Side-by-side comparison from 369 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Modern resources & diverse environment
- +Strong academic staff & faculty
- +High graduation rate
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +Accessible and flexible online learning environment.
- +Responsive and supportive faculty and staff.
- +Well-structured and valuable academic programs.
- +Supportive academic environment and approachable professors
- +Strong career support and diverse opportunities
- +Welcoming and inclusive campus community
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and unresponsive communication are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization in administration.
- -Poorly maintained facilities and outdated equipment.
- -Insufficient academic support and unengaging teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution garners perfect scores. Strengths are evident in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Conversely, no specific areas lag behind, as all ratings are consistently outstanding.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This university receives high marks across most aspects of student experience. Notably, Student Life and Professors are exceptionally strong areas, both scoring above 4.6. Accommodations, Internationality, and Value also perform very well, with scores exceeding 4.4. Facilities represent the lowest-rated category at 3.95, though it remains a respectable score.
This institution excels with perfect scores in Facilities and Internationality. Professors and Value also received strong ratings, alongside Accomodation and Location which performed well. Student Life, however, stands out as a weaker area compared to the other evaluated aspects.
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
With a 5/5 average rating, the university is highly praised. Students highlight excellent modern resources, faculty diversity, and strong academic staff, particularly in Arts. A high graduation rate is also a notable positive.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
The ~100% of positive reviews highlight responsive faculty, flexible online learning with easy-to-navigate platforms, and well-structured programs. Students appreciate academic support and resources contributing to their success.
With an average rating of 4.75/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight a supportive academic environment, strong career preparation, and campus inclusivity. There are no negative reviews in this sample.
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
