Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs Egyptian Russian University vs Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering vs Helwan university - HU

Side-by-side comparison from 20 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/7 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 0/7 categories
Egyptian Russian University: wins 1/7 categories
Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering: wins 0/7 categories
Helwan university - HU: wins 0/7 categories
Egyptian Chinese University - ECU: wins 0/7 categories
El Sewedy University of Technology - SUTech: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Art History
Best programme: Electronics and Telecommunication
Best programme: MBA specialisation Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
4.50
3.00
Not rated
3.69
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
3.50
2.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.46
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.33
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.69
Not rated
3.00
Value
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
3.50
1.00
Not rated
3.23
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Supportive lecturers & practical, rewarding courses
  • +Modern facilities & equipment
  • +Strong international focus and challenging courses
  • +Dedicated faculty and close-knit community
  • +Unique educational experience

Nothing to show

  • +High quality of teaching staff and accommodating faculty.
  • +Abundant academic resources and diverse, multidisciplinary programs.
  • +Excellent organization and supervision of university operations.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication plague students.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course availability frustrate students.

Nothing to show

  • -Coursework policies and grading inconsistencies discourage genuine learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and outdated assessment formats are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This institution shines particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4. The **Internationality** score, at 3, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, along with **Location** and **Accomodation**, which both sit at 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths and some areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in faculty quality, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces considerable challenges regarding accommodation, which received the lowest possible rating. Facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately. The location is also identified as a weaker area, with a score of two.

Nothing to show

This institution performs exceptionally well in academic and financial aspects, with a perfect 4.0 rating for Professors and Value. Student Life and Facilities also received solid scores, both at 3.69. The weakest areas identified were Accomodation (3.23) and Location (3.33), though Internationality remains moderate at 3.46.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted life-changing experiences, academically rewarding courses combining theory and practice, and supportive lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted regarding administrative delays.

The sole review for Egyptian Russian University is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights the international focus and challenging courses, though minor administrative issues were noted.

Nothing to show

With a 3.92 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising diverse faculties, quality teaching staff, and available resources. A small percentage (~7.7%) of negative feedback indicates disappointment with specific programs and grading practices.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
0%
0%
31%
0%
0%
4★
0%
50%
100%
0%
38%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
23%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close