Centro de Estudios Garrigues vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Brigham Young University-Hawaii vs University of Banja Luka - UNIBL vs Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
Side-by-side comparison from 235 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Diverse global community & supportive environment
- +Excellent academic programs & dedicated faculty
- +Valuable job opportunities & career preparation
- +Dedicated and approachable faculty
- +Strong sense of community and small class sizes
- +Good university organization and high academic criteria
- +Strong curriculum and faculty
- +Friendly student body
- +Overall positive experience despite infrastructure issues
- +Balanced theory and practical learning
- +Engaging faculty and teaching quality
- +Diverse academic programmes and co-curricular activities
- +Affordable fees and supportive environment
- +Quality education and academic programs
- +Opportunities for students from diverse backgrounds
Nothing to show
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are frequently criticized.
- -Communication breakdowns and a lack of responsiveness from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring problem.
- -Coursework and instruction often lack engagement or relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Course content and delivery methods are often perceived as poor or irrelevant.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & resources
- -Lack of career services & job support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
Nothing to show
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
This institution garners significant praise, with top marks awarded for **Student Life** and **Value**. Its **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** also score very well. The **Professors** are rated positively, though slightly lower than other areas. **Location** receives the lowest rating amongst the surveyed aspects.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location** (4.2) and **Student Life** (4.1), suggesting a vibrant and well-situated campus experience. **Professors** (3.8) and **Value** (3.9) also receive favorable marks. Conversely, **Internationality** (2.9) emerges as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in fostering a global community. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.5.
A mixed but generally positive evaluation emerges from these ratings. The university excels in its professors, location, and student life, all receiving perfect scores. However, its facilities stand out as a significant weakness, earning only two out of five. Accommodations and internationality are rated moderately, with value for money also performing well.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors and location both received a solid 3.83 rating, suggesting positive experiences in these key areas. Facilities and student life also scored well, averaging around 3.5. However, accommodations present a significant area for improvement with a low rating of 1.75, and internationality also lags at 2.67. Value for money sits at a moderate 3.33.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its faculty quality, advantageous location, and excellent accommodation options, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Student life and internationality, along with the facilities, are rated a respectable 3.5. Overall, the university offers strong value for its students.
Nothing to show
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
All 8 reviews are positive (~100%), with students highlighting the rewarding personal and professional growth, intellectually challenging academic environment, and excellent faculty. The university is praised for its superb structure and supportive learning experience.
With ~80% of reviews being positive, students generally find the university well-organized and rigorous. Some appreciate small class sizes and dedicated faculty. A recurring concern is that some curricula and technologies may be outdated.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights a solid curriculum and friendly students. Limited negative feedback did not provide specific recurring themes.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight engaging curriculum with practical applications and good faculty, though some note a slight lack of laboratory trainers.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight good education, affordable fees, and a positive environment. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
This university is very helpful for me and for other students. It helps me a lot in my studies. This is really great and helpful. I want that my job company is also like this university. In which I work. Thanks
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
While considering a university whether for BS, MS, or Ph.D. study there are several things to consider. This means tuition fees, co-curricular activities, university ranking, research papers published by that particular university, and scholarships provided to students yup! The infrastructure and nature too. Therefore, BUITEM is considered one of the best universities for providing different scholarships to its student. Engaging students in different co-curricular activities, arranging international conferences, and many more to opt for. Above all, for three years BUITEMS is winning the policy-making challenge all over Pakistan. From a study point of view, there are several departments that are considered best to study in BUITEM for instance Architecture, Civil Engineering, and Computer Science.
Nothing to show
