London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs Ravensbourne University London vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 383 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
- +Industry connections and career readiness
- +Practical, hands-on learning and skill development
- +Inspiring and welcoming creative environment
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Personalized, international learning environment with excellent teaching
- +Strong student support and access to global business networks
- +Beautiful campus and excellent facilities
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Lack of academic and administrative support.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
- -Insufficient time for major projects.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and course structure is disappointing.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a major concern.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4.33. **Facilities** also score well at 4.17. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.92. **Student life** is another area that could see improvement, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like professors, internationality, and value are rated moderately.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners a solid profile with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. The university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving exceptionally high marks. Student life and professor quality are also strong points. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant challenge, indicated by its lowest rating, and the value proposition is moderate. Facilities also received a less favorable score.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.
With ~74% positive feedback, students highlight Ravensbourne's inspirational environment, industry connections, and focus on digital and creative learning. No negative feedback was reported.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With a high percentage of positive feedback, reviews highlight a personalized international environment, small class sizes, and strong student support. Some mention excellent facilities and good teaching quality, while a few note administrative issues and staffing changes.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
