Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK vs Redeemer University College vs University of Uyo - UNIUYO vs Universidade Federal de Santa Maria vs Damascus University - DU

Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK (4.50)
Polish Japanese Academy of Information Technology - PJATK: wins 1/4 categories
Redeemer University College: wins 0/4 categories
University of Uyo - UNIUYO : wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria: wins 0/4 categories
Damascus University - DU: wins 0/4 categories
Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST: wins 2/4 categories
Syrian Virtual University: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Information Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Telecommunications Engineering
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Not rated
3.19
Not rated
3.67
4.00
5.00
Location
4.67
Not rated
4.11
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
4.67
Professors
4.33
Not rated
3.83
Not rated
4.33
4.00
3.67
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
3.07
Not rated
3.67
5.00
Win
3.67
Student life
4.00
Not rated
3.82
Not rated
3.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.76
Not rated
3.83
3.00
4.33
Accommodation
3.67
Not rated
3.03
Not rated
3.50
4.00
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and industry-focused programs
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Conducive and safe learning environment
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive lecturers
  • +Excellent educational and extracurricular experiences

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
  • +Modern learning environment and updated materials
  • +Opportunities for student growth and development
  • +Prestigious, rigorous applied sciences and engineering education
  • +High-quality graduates well-prepared for careers
  • +Specialized focus on telecommunications, microwave, and RF engineering
  • +Flexible online lectures and self-paced learning
  • +Affordability and recognized accreditation
  • +Online program and remote learning access
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative issues and lecturer inflexibility cause stress and academic failure.
  • -Insufficient and overcrowded facilities hinder practical learning and student comfort.
  • -Frequent academic strikes disrupt the learning process.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is problematic.
  • -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Overcrowding and limited access to essential services cause considerable dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Facilities**, which received a perfect score, and its **Location** and **Value**, both rated highly. The university also received a solid 4.33 for its **Professors**. Its **Accommodations** are a weaker area, scoring 3.67, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** received satisfactory marks at 4.

Nothing to show

Among the evaluated aspects of the university, location stands out as its strongest attribute, receiving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality are areas where the institution appears to have the most room for improvement, scoring lowest. Other categories like professors, student life, and value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance.

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a strong standing, particularly in its **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** is rated as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Other aspects like Facilities, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution shines brightest in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong points, earning solid 4s. However, **Location** is a significant weakness, with a score of 0, and **Value** sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for improvement.

This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a perfect score. Location is another strong point, rated highly at 4.67. Student life, however, is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Accommodations and value for money are also well-regarded, both at 4.33. Ratings for professors and internationality are moderate, around 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5 stars. Students highlight great teachers, strong industry connections, and a blend of theory and practice, particularly in computer science and multimedia.

Nothing to show

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a conducive learning environment, good teaching, and safety. A smaller portion, about 8.7%, expresses concerns about stress and inadequate facilities.

Nothing to show

With a 4.17 average rating from 6 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~83%). Students praise academic programs, faculty, modern facilities, and growth opportunities. A few mentioned slightly outdated instruments or large class sizes.

With a single review, this university has a 4/5 average rating. The sole feedback was positive, highlighting a prestigious education and rigorous assessment that prepares graduates well for careers.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise flexibility in scheduling, affordability, and the convenience of online lectures. Some mention a desire for fully remote exams.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
29%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
26%
0%
50%
100%
100%
3★
0%
0%
36%
0%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Challenging but Worth It

My experience at the University of Uyo was a mixed bag. On the plus side, I loved the sense of community and camaraderie among students. The lecturers in my department were knowledgeable and supportive, and I appreciated the opportunities for research and personal growth. However, I struggled with several issues. The hostel facilities were not ideal, and one major concern was the no-cooking policy in the hostels, which was quite challenging for many students. Additionally, there were times when administrative processes felt slow and bureaucratic. Another major concern was the high billing system, which felt excessive at times. Furthermore, I felt that the curriculum focused too much on theoretical aspects, leaving us somewhat unprepared for real-life practical issues. The infrastructure and facilities in some areas of the campus were also inadequate and outdated. Overall, I'd say UNIUYO has its strengths and weaknesses, but it was a valuable experience that helped me grow as a person and a professional.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close